Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3752
| From | Davide Grandi <davide.grandi@email.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Why should students still study compilers? |
| Date | 2026-08-29 09:31 +0200 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <26-08-015@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <26-08-004@comp.compilers> |
Hi, instinctively: because if someone works on software the lifecycle of a "program", compilers are simply fundamental. experimentally: it worked for my studies and "career", guiding my choices on software tools from writing to testing. And, in many cases, for transforming. philologically: the fifth book of "The art of computer programming" will be about scanning and parsing. culturally: if one knows at least the basics of grammars and syntax (not to speak about the following phases) that one can face the usually-butcomplex recurring problems, maybe choosing wisely the right tool Bye, end of my 0,02 € Davide On 24/08/2026 19:44, Roger L Costello wrote: > For many years, I've regarded compiler construction as one of the most > scientific, disciplined, and algorithmic areas of computer science. There is > something wonderfully satisfying about a field in which so much can be derived > systematically rather than done by the seat of the pants. > > The difficulty, at least in my experience, is that there simply aren't that > many jobs writing compilers. Occasionally I get a small job writing a > dedicated parser, but for the most part I have little opportunity to use > compiler algorithms professionally. That makes it hard to justify spending my > limited time keeping those skills fresh. > > And now I wonder whether LLMs will reduce the demand for some kinds of > compiler and parser expertise even further. > > So I'm curious what people on this list think: **Why should a computer science > student today take a compiler course?** > > Do students take compiler courses because the techniques they learn are likely > to be useful in their careers, despite the relatively small number of jobs > involving compiler development? Or is the real value of a compiler course that > it teaches broader ways of thinking about languages, grammars, > representations, transformations, optimization, and software systems? > > And has the arrival of LLMs changed your answer at all? -- ing. Davide Grandi email : davide.grandi@email.it mobile : +39 339 7468 778 linkedin : http://linkedin.com/in/davidegrandi
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why should students still study compilers? Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> - 2026-08-24 17:44 +0000 Re: Why should students still study compilers? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de - 2026-08-26 16:37 +0000 Re: Why should students still study compilers? Davide Grandi <davide.grandi@email.it> - 2026-08-29 09:31 +0200
csiph-web