Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #272815

Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE )

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:GYSdnW2kw__J0kzInZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
> wrote in message news:a990909152ffc20d67bb56b180d7eb8b@dizum.com...

>> Kook. LOL

> Kook?  And yet it was you who was caught lying about the disappearing wing 
> on the alleged Flight 175.

There was no "disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175", your
broken brain has concocted a fantasy because it's broken. Just as
there were not 19 nuclear weapons detonated at the WTC complex
after they'd dug themselves holes from a depth of 37.28 to 96.93
miles in 12 seconds before detonating, as you've k'lamed. Get
back on your meds.

Kook. LOL

>> No, it wasn't. In the upper floors, the truss frame surround was
>> as thin as 1/4".

> The truss frame is what went between the core columns and the outside wall 
> and I don't care about the truss frame I care about the thickness of the 
> outside wall.

The "outside wall" was not load bearing. It was a fascia, nothing
more. The outer perimeter of the floor spars were vertically
supported via the truss frame. The truss frame was horizontally
supported by the floor spars. They were literally glued together
through viscoelastic dampers.

Once the fire melted the viscoelastic dampers and the central
support column had become heat soaked and thus weakened enough to
buckle, the top hat truss transferred some of the weight of the
building onto the truss frame, bowing it outward. Thus, the floor
spars lost their perimeter means of vertical support,
transferring the full weight of the floors onto that weakened
central supporting column, which then exceeded its plastic
deformation limit and collapsed. From there, the building fell,
unzipping somewhat like a zipper... the viscoelastic dampers
tearing away, the truss frame bowing outward, and the floor spars
falling downward as the weight continued to increase on the
weakened central support column.

The building designers had been warned by competent building
designers of just such a scenario due to a major fire from as far
back as 1971, but they dismissed it.

That you don't even understand simple building engineering
doesn't bode well for the rest of your utterly nonsensical
blather.

Kook. LOL

> I also stated you would have to provide a link because after your remark 
> about the disappearing wing your "credibility is waning."

I stated that there was no "disappearing wing", and there wasn't.
Your broken brain has concocted a fantastical and utterly
impossible conspiracy theory that violates the law of physics.
The laws of physics are immutable, there's no way around them...
meaning you're insane.

Kook. LOL

> And the cool thing about deleting your comments is I don't have to see you 
> play an Internet Doctor with no credentials.
> 
> Could it be what I'm really seeing is another meltdown just like what 
> happened with Jim Pennino?  And talking about Jim it was obvious he was 
> losing it when he would refuse to post to alt.astronomy where Bast could 
> help him.  <G>
> 
> Rocky

Let's review your fantasy kook conspiracy theory, and you'll be
given the opportunity to go point-by-point and explain exactly
how it is that your whacko theory gets around the laws of
physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep
below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to
drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact
that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal
*melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636
miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole
*ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why
the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite
uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one
sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and
thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's
electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been
sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate
aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your
claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that
there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke.
If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have
shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It could have
been depleted uranium, used as counterweight in airplanes. So
either the planes were switched for 747s, or Boeing lied and was
using DU instead of tungsten in the 767s in question. Or the
Americium in the smoke detectors was scattered so finely that it
was able to quickly decay to a level below background radiation
levels, but that'd be beta radiation... or the tritium in the
aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights may have
been the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was
experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even
know what types of radiation there are.

4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by
people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you
k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take
something on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the
depths you k'lame the bombs were buried.

5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts,
the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays,
include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start
any sort of nuclear chain reaction.

6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as*
*it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling
vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going
to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would
be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the
temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through
a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into
surrounding rock.

9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite
uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at
the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were
experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

10) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from 37.28 to
96.93 miles deep to directly under the WTC complex, in 12
seconds, prior to detonating.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to
service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source
triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic
basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at
37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology
to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4
blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced
to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat
contentedly for 33 years and maintained their viability) are
supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?
======================================================

There's now 11 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws
of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one,
point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who
can't grasp simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from
way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with
that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda
Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a
cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a
folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat
food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given
that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has
cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums,
missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder,
Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half
in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with
Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got
growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs
have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience
with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and
turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits
HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at
the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for
trolling.

"Big things are made out of little things."
HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe.

Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com>
"all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e.
everywhere at the same time)"
Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear
transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most
universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the
very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after
the big bang, and most importantly, reality.

Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same
thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the
statements:
1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because
the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each
other."
2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your
consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from
consciousness."

MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com>
"Who said it's your eyes that see?"
HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity.

"The Turing test is overrated anyway."
HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing
test.

"The now you experience now simply moves to this now."
HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past.

Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself:
"A fairyboy with an inadequate penis."

Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic
bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and
able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any
assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work
producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per
day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick
started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality,
he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to
lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance,
because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears
yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming,
fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his
otherwise-dumbstruck mouth.

<snicker>

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200
  Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0500
    Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0500
      Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-16 09:50 -0400
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:21 -0500
    Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:22 +0200
      Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:39 -0500
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:47 -0700
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:12 +0200
          Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:34 -0500
            Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
              Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 18:35 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 04:19 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( Checkmated checkmate ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( Checkmated checkmate ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 08:09 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:48 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 17:05 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE credentials ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:23 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE credentials ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:27 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE is a complete idiot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:45 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE is a complete idiot ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:00 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:10 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-18 14:27 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 18:37 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 10:34 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:35 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:14 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:53 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 17:33 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-20 00:07 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-21 14:15 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:31 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 23:51 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 23:07 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-18 15:07 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:07 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 23:28 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:55 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfoolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:21 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfoolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:57 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:07 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 09:46 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:15 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:37 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
          Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500
            Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200

csiph-web