Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #38401
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: check for obj nested prop |
| Date | 2020-05-12 09:28 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2559382.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <C9udnTlJHfCQbSnDnZ2dnUU7-U3NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <87pnbeycrm.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <11518358.O9o76ZdvQC@PointedEars.de> <873689yi4j.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> writes:
>>>> so I end up doing
>>>>
>>>> if (a && a.b && a.b.c && a.b.c.d)
>>> <cut>
>>>> Is there a way to get the check value of an object's nested property
>>>> without first having to test for all the ascendant properties?
>>>
>>> if (try {obj.a.b.c.d} catch {})
>>>
>>> might do what you want.
>>
>> This is *obviously* syntactically invalid;
>
> Yes, wishful thinking. You'd need a function call and a return:
>
> if ( (()=>{ try {return obj.a.b.c.d} catch {} })() ) ...
>
> which makes it rather clumsy.
It is not only clumsy, it is also not safe (and this particular syntax
is also not backwards-compatible; the compatible syntax is even more
clumsy); see my *detailed* follow-up.
--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
check for obj nested prop Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2020-05-08 15:37 +1000
Re: check for obj nested prop Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-05-08 10:52 +0100
Re: check for obj nested prop Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-05-09 00:26 +0200
Re: check for obj nested prop Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-05-09 03:09 +0100
Re: check for obj nested prop Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-05-12 09:28 +0200
Re: check for obj nested prop Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-05-12 04:01 -0700
Exception handling (was: check for obj nested prop) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-05-09 03:46 +0200
Re: check for obj nested prop JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2020-05-08 17:18 +0700
Re: check for obj nested prop Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-05-08 03:53 -0700
Re: check for obj nested prop James Kirk <noneya.invalid@gmail.com> - 2020-05-08 11:00 -0400
Re: check for obj nested prop Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-05-09 00:19 +0200
Re: check for obj nested prop Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-05-12 04:04 -0700
Re: check for obj nested prop luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-05-12 07:59 -0700
Re: check for obj nested prop "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-05-12 14:17 -0700
Re: check for obj nested prop Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-05-13 02:46 +0200
Re: check for obj nested prop Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2020-05-13 13:08 +1000
Re: check for obj nested prop "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-05-13 12:30 -0700
csiph-web