Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #72096
| Subject | Re: Backup Question |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-25 21:12 -0700 |
| From | Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Message-ID | <250320152112194332%otto@bogus.address.com> (permalink) |
| References | <250320151703564234%otto@bogus.address.com> <slrnmh719l.9nl.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| Organization | Sonic.Net |
In article <slrnmh719l.9nl.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > Okay, so one time? In band camp? Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> was all, > like: > > Do I have this correct? > > > CCC makes an exact clone of your entire drive (bootable if you want) > > and then every time after that if you run CCC, it will only backup what > > is new by replacing the file/app/document with a new copy. > > For certain values of "exact clone" yes, that is true, depending on the > settings you chose. CCC can keep differential backups to some extent. > > > TM, on the other hand, makes incremental backups of what ever > > file/app/document so that you will have multiple copies of the same > > file with increasing "newness". > > Yes, though for many files TM stores the changes, and not entirely new > copies of the changed file (Pages docs, for example). > > > Advantages/disadvantages of both and can you have both on the same > > physical drive and still be able to use both without messing up either > > one? > > I would never combine backups onto a single drive. > > HD space is extremely cheap. Absurdly cheap. Thanks for the comments on not putting both on a single drive. Makes a lot of sense.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Backup Question Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> - 2015-03-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Backup Question Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-03-25 21:13 -0400
Re: Backup Question Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> - 2015-03-25 19:15 -0700
Re: Backup Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 23:07 -0400
Re: Backup Question M-M <nospam@ny.more> - 2015-03-26 00:07 -0400
Re: Backup Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 00:10 -0400
Re: Backup Question me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2015-03-26 14:02 +0000
Re: Backup Question Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 14:28 +0000
Re: Backup Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:02 -0400
Re: Backup Question Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-03-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Backup Question Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 15:37 +0000
Re: Backup Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:57 -0400
Re: Backup Question Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 17:01 +0000
Re: Backup Question nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 13:32 -0400
Re: Backup Question Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 17:47 +0000
Re: Backup Question Ed Anson <EdAnson@comcast.net> - 2015-03-26 18:14 -0400
Re: Backup Question Király <ggrandish@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 15:57 -0700
Re: Backup Question Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> - 2015-03-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Backup Question Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 01:51 +0000
Re: Backup Question Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> - 2015-03-27 20:23 -0700
Re: Backup Question Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-28 01:40 +0000
Re: Backup Question Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-26 04:03 +0000
Re: Backup Question Otto Pylot <otto@bogus.address.com> - 2015-03-25 21:12 -0700
Re: Backup Question billy@MIX.COM - 2015-03-26 17:01 +0000
csiph-web