Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #22871

Re: Don't clutter your desktop

From nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Don't clutter your desktop
Date 2012-03-25 12:19 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <250320121219256931%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <dorayme-11261A.10215425032012@news.albasani.net> <HelpfulHarry-2503121516310001@203-118-187-112.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz> <1khjdbm.k407xkc1xfl5N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nospam.m-m-9FB80F.10042225032012@cpe-76-190-186-198.neo.res.rr.com> <pcudnSn1F99nq_LSnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <pcudnSn1F99nq_LSnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
<alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:

> > Does it still slow things down if you have a lot of files on your
> > desktop? It used to.
> 
> I recall reading somewhere (Macworld magazine IIRC) that the more icons 
> on the desktop, the more CPU was being used.  This never made sense to 
> me, an icon should be a static object.
> 
> But, at least in earlier OS X', each icon is actually a finder "Window" 
> that the system has to manage (each has resources in memory and gets 
> regularly scheduled CPU to do ... nothing).

> Maybe with newer v. of OS X they've added some sanity to that and either 
> they really are static, or at least use much less CPU.

each icon was really a small window with a full backing store (not
compressed either, very stupid). the more visible icons there were, the
more memory was used up and the less there was for actual apps. they
did change it to a compressed backing store at some point. 

this mattered a lot more back when os x first came out and macs shipped
with 64-128 meg of memory and could only be expanded to 640 meg, such
as with the white ibook. still, you had to have a *lot* of icons to
notice a difference.

icons no longer do that so it isn't an issue anymore, but even if they
still did, macs now have substantially more memory and the cpu & gpu
are much faster too..

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Don't clutter your desktop dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-03-24 08:47 +1100
  Re: Don't clutter your desktop Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-03-24 10:45 -0400
    Re: Don't clutter your desktop dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-03-25 10:21 +1100
      Re: Don't clutter your desktop HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-03-25 15:16 +1200
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-03-25 15:11 +1100
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-25 23:38 +1300
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2012-03-25 10:04 -0400
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 10:09 -0400
              Re: Don't clutter your desktop jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-26 04:42 +1300
              Re: Don't clutter your desktop Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2012-03-25 11:43 -0400
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-03-25 11:17 -0400
              Re: Don't clutter your desktop nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-25 12:19 -0400
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-26 04:40 +1300
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop MC <copespaz@mapca.inter.net> - 2012-03-26 13:58 -0400
  Re: Don't clutter your desktop Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-03-24 16:51 +0100
    Re: Don't clutter your desktop Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-03-24 10:21 -0700
      Re: Don't clutter your desktop jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-03-25 09:31 +1300
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-03-24 19:38 -0700
      Re: Don't clutter your desktop Sharon F <sharonfDELETE@THISmvps.org> - 2012-04-23 12:49 -0500
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop paris2venice@gmail.com - 2012-04-23 11:17 -0700
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-24 07:33 +1200
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop Sharon F <sharonfDELETE@THISmvps.org> - 2012-04-25 09:59 -0500
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> - 2012-04-23 20:24 +0000
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-24 09:27 +1200
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-23 22:28 +0100
            Re: Don't clutter your desktop Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> - 2012-04-25 10:03 +0000
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-24 08:35 +1000
        Re: Don't clutter your desktop "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-04-23 18:20 -0400
          Re: Don't clutter your desktop Sharon F <sharonfDELETE@THISmvps.org> - 2012-04-25 09:54 -0500
    Re: Don't clutter your desktop dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-03-25 10:14 +1100

csiph-web