Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Map C++ feature to C |
| References | <js6ip6$qb1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a4o4ojFe9mU2@mid.individual.net> <js812m$ak3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a4phm2FaukU1@mid.individual.net> <caf65604-f87f-4e89-a59e-56db88999717@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <24mPr.29428$ja1.16975@fx33.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2012-07-24 01:34 +0100 |
On 23/07/2012 18:25, nroberts wrote: > On Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:12:18 PM UTC-7, Ian Collins wrote: >> On 06/25/12 09:33 AM, zgene wrote: >> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:25:38 +1200, Ian Collins wrote: >> > >> >> On 06/24/12 08:23 PM, zgene wrote: >> >>> Dear friends >> >> >> >> Why is the question completely different form the subject? >> >> >> >>> Is there a way to embulate C++'s virtual destructors in pure C. IE just >> >>> using function pointers. >> >> >> >> No, because there isn't a way to fully emulate destructors. >> > >> > I doubt this answer..... do you have any evidence?? >> >> Show me a way to automatically call a function on leaving a scope in C >> and we can go from there. > > This is probably THE most important feature of C++ missing from standard C but it can be done with GCC extensions: > > type var __attribute__(cleanup(destroyType)) = newType(); > It is not any feature "missing" from the C standard. C is not C++, nor should it be. gcc extensions like this are frankly a bastardisation of C, and should be discouraged. C, unlike C++ has only one possible interpretation for any valid construct. This makes is substantially more predictable, and reduces many overheads of the more complex features. Take the following C++ code: Foo f = Foo(g); Care to explain exactly what that statement means? What would be the equivalent in meaning for C? ~Andrew
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Map C++ feature to C zgene <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-06-24 08:23 +0000
Re: Map C++ feature to C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-24 21:25 +1200
Re: Map C++ feature to C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-24 13:39 -0500
Re: Map C++ feature to C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-25 10:15 +1200
Re: Map C++ feature to C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-25 11:32 -0500
Re: Map C++ feature to C zgene <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-06-24 21:33 +0000
Re: Map C++ feature to C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-25 10:12 +1200
Re: Map C++ feature to C William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-06-24 18:49 -0700
Re: Map C++ feature to C nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 10:25 -0700
Re: Map C++ feature to C Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-07-24 01:34 +0100
Re: Map C++ feature to C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-07-24 15:58 +0000
Re: Map C++ feature to C "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-24 11:36 -0700
Re: Map C++ feature to C Leo Havmøller <rtxleh@nospam.nospam> - 2012-06-25 05:43 +0200
Re: Map C++ feature to C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-06-25 10:34 +0000
Re: Map C++ feature to C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Map C++ feature to C Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2012-06-24 12:19 -0700
Re: Map C++ feature to C 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-24 19:49 -0700
Re: Map C++ feature to C aftnix <aftnix@gmail.com> - 2012-07-26 13:36 -0700
csiph-web