Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #719363

Dan Christensen points out how foolish the professors of math and physics at Cornell Univ are-- believing 3 OR 2 = 5, with 3 AND 2=1

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2018-12-18 22:33 -0800
Message-ID <2337f413-dfd3-413c-82e5-dfd588784e61@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Dan Christensen points out how foolish the professors of math and physics at Cornell Univ are-- believing 3 OR 2 = 5, with 3 AND 2=1
From Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 9:38:24 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. 
> 
> 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? __________   (Ans: 0.707) 
>   
> 2. True or false:  10^604 = 0   __________  (Ans: False) 
>   
> 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is  __________ (Ans: False) 
> 
> 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is __________ (Ans: True) 

> 
> Dan

AP writes: no wonder math and physics professors of Cornell are failures-- when they cannot tell a oval apart from an ellipse and they nattering nutter the Boole Logic of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1.

Why does any physicist not believe proton is 840MeV, electron is 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding, because a ratio of 840 to 105 allows for Angular Momentum


Dan Christensen, 6 year insane stalker Canadian 

                              .. 
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-.. 
           ,      . `.'            '        `. 
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ; 
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ; 
         ;   . '                       `.  .   ' 
          . '                            ` `.  | 
        . '.                                  ' 
       .          0              0            ' `. 
      '                                          ` 
     ;                                            ` 
    .'                                             ` 
    ;                      U                        ` 
    ;    ';                                         ` 
    :   | ;..                                 :`     ` 
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    ' 
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    ' 
     ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  I am Christensen, so dumb I think chemistry bonding can exist with proton 938MeV & electron at .5MeV just as dumb as my idea that Boole logic is valid as 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6, when a 8 year old knows 10 AND 4= 14 
      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    ' 
       `       `        ;            ;      '    ' 
        `       `        ;          ;      '    ' 
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    ' 
           `       .                     '    ' 
         /  `       `.                  '    '        . 
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...' 
       /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....''' 
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   ` 
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      ` 
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       ` 
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       ` 
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     ` 
                  |    '     `      '     `.    ` 
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  | 
                  `.'          `    ;         `-' 
                                `...' 



Christensen says Cornell professors too dumb in logic; Philippe Sosoe,Yuri Berest,Justin Moore, Birgit E. Speh too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding

AP writes: why does Christensen simply not ask professors of physics or mathematics of Cornell Univ why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole 

   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Cornell?   

Why no math professor at Cornell understands the oval is a conic section, never the ellipse-- because they are pathetic fools of math Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND. 

AP writes: Christensen, why you want to fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept? Why? because they accept the fool Boole that 10 OR 2 = 12 while 10 AND 2 = 8. Or is it because the Cornell professors were so dumb and dull as to never see the ellipse was a cylinder section never a conic? 

Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND 

Cornell Univ math dept which none of them can even do correct logic, witness-- the imps still abide by the worthless Boole Logic of 8 OR 3 = 11 with 8 AND 3 = 5, when even a 8 year kid knows that 8 AND 3 = 11, so, hopeless in doing correct math. And to this very day the fools of Cornell Math dept still believe a ellipse is a conic when a High School student can bring to these professors a cone and Kerr jar lid and demonstrate the slant cut is a oval, never an ellipse. All of which made worse in that these failing professors control Arxiv.org. The blind leading the blind. 

See TRUE LOGIC corrections below:: 
President Cornell: Martha Pollack (computer science)

Martha, don't you feel ashamed that your math and logic professors brainwash young students in the error filled Boole Logic? You yourself being a computer scientist, and to fill young students with the brainwash manure of Boole logic. Martha, did you know that Boole went to lecture at a college and forgot his umbrella in a downpour rain, and on arrival instead of changing into dry clothes lectured in front of students shivering cold and wet and caught pneumonia and then ordered his wife to make the bed wet and give him cold showers, thinking that to combat pneumonia is to use coldness. Of course Boole died from pneumonia for he was a illogical fool. And Martha, to think that a barren of logic mind of Boole is what silly math professors of Cornell abide by.


Cornell Univ math dept
Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty 
Marcelo Aguiar 
Jason Manning 
Slawomir Solecki 
Dan M. Barbasch 
Karola Meszaros 
Philippe Sosoe 
Yuri Berest 
Justin Moore 
Birgit E. Speh 
Louis Billera 
Camil Muscalu 
Michael E. Stillman 
Xiaodong Cao 
Anil Nerode 
Robert S. Strichartz 
Robert Connelly 
Michael Nussbaum 
Steven Strogatz 
R. Keith Dennis 
Irena Peeva 
Edward Swartz 
Daniel Halpern-Leistner 
Ravi Ramakrishna 
Nicolas Templier 
Timothy J. Healey 
Richard H. Rand 
Alex Townsend 
Tara Holm 
Timothy Riley 
Alexander Vladimirsky 
John H. Hubbard 
Laurent Saloff-Coste 
Marten Wegkamp 
Martin Kassabov 
Shankar Sen 
James E. West 
Allen Knutson 
Richard A. Shore 
Inna Zakharevich 
Lionel Levine 
Reyer Sjamaar 
David Zywina 
Emeritus and Retired Faculty 
Allen Back 
Allen Hatcher 
Alfred H. Schatz 
James H. Bramble 
David W. Henderson 
John Smillie 
Kenneth S. Brown 
J.T. Gene Hwang 
Moss E. Sweedler 
Stephen U. Chase 
Yulij Ilyashenko 
Daina Taimina 
Marshall M. Cohen 
Peter J. Kahn 
Robert E. Terrell 
Clifford J. Earle 
Harry Kesten 
Maria S. Terrell 
Roger H. Farrell 
G. Roger Livesay 
Karen Vogtmann 
Leonard Gross 
Michael D. Morley 
Beverly West 
John M. Guckenheimer 


And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, starpower is only 10% fusion, 90% Faraday Law of its atoms.

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.  

Yes, there Christensen?, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is105 MeV. 

What answer did they give?



Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Dan Christensen points out how foolish the professors of math and physics at Cornell Univ are-- believing 3 OR 2 = 5, with 3 AND 2=1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 22:33 -0800
  Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-19 09:49 +0000
    Burse says ETH physicists Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 13:10 -0800

csiph-web