Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2083211

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <fqdsdbh268tkovchj8cj027427vuf9l619@4ax.com>
mur@. wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 01:15:26 -0600, Wuss Lee wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:03:22 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >>On 28-February-2016 2:26 PM, Robert Duncan wrote:
> >>> On 2/27/2016 10:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>> In article <djehsuFe3pnU1@mid.individual.net>,
> >>>>   felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 24-February-2016 1:40 PM, mur@. wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:47:27 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
> >>>>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
> >>>>>>>>> by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
> >>>>>>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
> >>>>>>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
> >>>>>>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
> >>>>>>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
> >>>>>>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
> >>>>>>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
> >>>>>>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
> >>>>>>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
> >>>>>>>>> into consideration.
> >>>>>>> How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
> >>>>>>> non-event, even strong atheism.
> >>>>>>       Strong atheism is an entirely faith based belief.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "There's no God"
> >>>>>>       Is undoubtedly an entirely faith based belief. If you'd like to
> >>>>>>       pretend
> >>>>>> there's reason to doubt that fact, try presenting evidence to support it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
> >>>>>>> UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
> >>>>>>       All are entirely faith based,
> >>>>> his (apparent) inability to comprehend the most simple things is
> >>>>> staggering. to suggest that 'there is/are no (whatever)" is not a belief
> >>>>> is just crazy.
> >>>> But almost none of us have any such belief.
> >>> You may not call it a belief, but that's what it is.
> >
> >Yet another arrogantly nasty, lying theist.
> >
> >>> When I slam on brakes to avoid hitting a squirrel, I don't call it
> >>> "rapid deceleration", but that's what it is.
> >>>
> >>> It's alright if you don't want to call it a belief, it's alright if you
> >>> despise the word belief.
> >
> >Belief has a whole spectrum of meanings - none of which describe its
> >absence.
> >
> >But theists replace whatever less ambiguous words you use, with it and
> >then claim its the same kind of belief as theirs.
> >
> >>> No one is saying you have to use that word.
> >>>
> >>> Just be aware that when you say, "I don't believe in God", or anything
> >>> similar to that, there are people standing (or sitting) around you who
> >>> know that what you are really saying is, "I believe there is no God."
> >
> >What a fucking moron.
> >
> >>> It's just that simple.  No more, and no less
> >
> >No - they *think* that - because they are stupid and can't tell the
> >difference between not doing something and doing its opposite.
> >
> >It's just that simple,  No more, and no less.
> >
> >They imagine the whole world revolves around  their god, even for
> >atheists, and are too stupid to understand that it's merely something
> >somebody else believes as part of their religion, that is unimportant
> >and irrelevant outside it.
> >
> >Because Christianity erects walls around their minds to keep out
> >anything that conflicts with their beliefs, and a side effect of this
> >is that it prevents their understanding others.
> >
> >It also prevents empathy so they see nothing wrong with their
> >behaviour towards non-Christians,
> >
> >They're not mind readers, even though they arrogantly and nastily
> >imagine they get to tell us they know what is in our minds better than
> >we do ourselves, and that we're perjuring ourselves when we correct
> >them after they got it wrong the first time.
>
>     Try to present any evidence that you're mentally capable of realistically
> considering the possibility that any sort of god exists anywhere in the
> universe. Not some stupid unrealistic shit you morons pathetically pretend to
> consider as an attempted insult to the idea even though in reality it's an
> insult to you and all your horribly mentally restricted brethren, but that YOU
> actually ARE CAPABLE of realistically considering the possibility. You can't
> even make the attempt, because it's so far beyond your mental ability you can't
> even pretend it's not.

Lol.  If you can't imagine the existence of a godly being, you 
have no imagination.  Turn off the TV and open a book or shoot 
yourself.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "wagner" <wagner@dont-email.me> - 2016-04-01 03:52 +0200
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2016-04-01 02:42 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-04-03 20:52 -0400
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2016-04-04 02:31 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-04-09 10:23 -0400

csiph-web