Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #19244
| Message-ID | <2120096.TvCSgZqcje@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2013-04-12 01:03 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <e988e830-46b7-45de-a6ba-a411a89a0c09@googlegroups.com> <3440417.l2pBrVLpSq@PointedEars.de> <KvYUAsE3VvZRFwlM@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> |
Dr J R Stockton wrote: > In comp.lang.javascript message <3440417.l2pBrVLpSq@PointedEars.de>, > Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:02:25, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > <PointedEars@web.de> posted: > >>You should adhere to code conventions common to the used programming >>language (and _not_ to one common to *another* language). > > And so should you; so let us hear no more wittering about attributions > differing from conventions peculiar to the .de hierarchy. If you had paid attention, I was talking about *code* conventions of *programming* languages. Curious, though; I would have expected a rambling about code style from you, since your JS/ES code style is like that of non- Object Pascal, even worse than the OP's. As for attribution _lines_ instead of your novels, and why the latter is inappropriate, see for example <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Attribution_lines> which is not running the risk of being “.de”-specific. Note that the section describes the attribution _line_, despite its title. BTW, it's “de.”, “de.*”, or “de.ALL“ hierarchy. (So much for your understanding NetNews.) -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Sergey Zakharov <sergzach@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 12:37 -0700
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-04-11 00:02 +0200
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-04-11 18:40 +0100
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-04-12 01:03 +0200
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? x@x.com (znôrt) - 2013-04-12 21:16 +0200
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-04-13 11:45 -0700
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? x@x.com (znôrt) - 2013-04-14 14:36 +0200
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-04-15 09:27 +0100
"Javascript" (was: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-04-15 14:55 +0200
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-04-16 18:09 +0100
Re: Is an idea of website where users can compete with each other interesting? Sergey Zakharov <sergzach@gmail.com> - 2013-04-11 04:10 -0700
csiph-web