Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #123701

Re: A neat hash table implementation

From Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: A neat hash table implementation
Date 2026-04-10 18:12 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20260410181207.00001af9@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <ca7eee2f1134ba8b581b04e342c9942ecff4bdcd.camel@gmail.com> <10raqnu$12nem$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <baa67c36a78da1ef64c205ad4880eeb7615d5947.camel@gmail.com> <10ratd2$13kp7$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <c51888d717990230fdabc6595fe36b9e0e4bd3d4.camel@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 22:35:52 +0800
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2026-04-10 at 15:19 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > Am 10.04.2026 um 15:11 schrieb wij:
> >   
> > > Whenever you want to SEE a 'short and becautiful' case of usage,
> > > there will be one, you just write the library in the background
> > > for it yourself.  
> > 
> > You see the details withot the whole picture. unordered_map is a
> > very large class. Although there might be some work for the hasher
> > it saves really much time over C.  
> 
> I guess std::unordered_map won't be 'very large', because I
> implemented a red-black tree class.

red-black tree is at core of std::map.
It is unrelated to std::unordered_map.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 13:13 +0300
  Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 13:07 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 19:50 +0800
      Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 14:34 +0200
        Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 21:11 +0800
          Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 15:19 +0200
            Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 22:35 +0800
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:07 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 00:16 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-04-10 16:30 +0000
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 18:50 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 01:40 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 08:26 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 20:09 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:29 +0200
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 18:12 +0300
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 00:26 +0800
        Re: A neat hash table implementation 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jmj@energokod.gda.pl> - 2026-04-10 16:38 +0200
          Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:08 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 19:51 +0800

csiph-web