Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.theory > #136776

Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box

From Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math
Subject Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box
Date 2025-11-29 02:58 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20251128185159.619@kylheku.com> (permalink)
References <20210525093603.853@kylheku.com> <wt-dnSyJ8L7AwLf0nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-11-29, olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> On 5/25/2021 11:56 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> In Message ID <I8ednT5676UOvjT9nZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Peter
>> Olcott admits that he's wrong according to "conventional analysis" and that
>> discussing with him requires following some "unconventional"
>> analysis.
>> 
>> PO: I understand where you are coming from. I am coming from somewhere else.
>> PO: If you analyze what I am saying using conventional analysis then what I
>> PO: am saying is incorrect.
>> 
>> "Conventional analysis" is the only vessel which lets us sail into every
>> imaginable universe such that we can be sure of anything. Those
>> universes are the only "somewhere elses" we need.
>
> *Kaz cannot think outside the box*

Nope; I don't want to think outside of the correctness box,
if I can help it. Only by accident.

The box where I exactly understand the definition of the problem
and all of its constraints, so that I'm addressing myself to the
problem and not something sort of resembling it, and the box in which
I avoid magical/wishful thinking.

> Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, named after mathematicians Ernst Zermelo 
> and Abraham Fraenkel
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%E2%80%93Fraenkel_set_theory
>
> Could think outside the box, otherwise Russell's Paradox
> would still prove undecidability.

1. Meaningless appeal to authority.

2. While we are appealing to authorities, you are not worth a pimple
on the ass of these gentlemen. What it means for you to think outside
the box is qualitatively different from how they thought outside of
the box.

>> PO: The whole diagonalization thing is gibberish to me unless it only shows

Great, quote yourself being an idiot some years ago! Yay!

> Welcome to SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 7.6.4)
> SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software.
> Please run ?- license. for legal details.
>
> % This sentence is not true.
> ?- LP = not(true(LP)).

Not an example of diagonalization; the Liar Paradox is not
a diagonal argument.

Diagonal arguemnts patterned after Cantor do not exhibit
a problem that is analogous to the Liar Paradox.

So, indeed, yes, the "whole diagonalization thing is gibberish" to you.

Or should we say, it is outside of your tiny box.

-- 
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Back to comp.theory | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2025-11-28 20:41 -0600
  Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 02:58 +0000
    Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 21:25 -0600
      Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 04:17 +0000
        Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 23:05 -0600
          Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 05:52 +0000
            Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 08:20 -0600
              Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 20:39 +0000
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 14:56 -0600
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 16:34 -0500
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:16 -0800
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:05 -0500
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 21:53 +0000
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 16:01 -0600
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 22:57 +0000
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 17:24 -0600
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:08 -0500
                Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:07 -0500

csiph-web