Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #136776
| From | Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box |
| Date | 2025-11-29 02:58 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20251128185159.619@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | <20210525093603.853@kylheku.com> <wt-dnSyJ8L7AwLf0nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-11-29, olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote: > On 5/25/2021 11:56 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >> In Message ID <I8ednT5676UOvjT9nZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Peter >> Olcott admits that he's wrong according to "conventional analysis" and that >> discussing with him requires following some "unconventional" >> analysis. >> >> PO: I understand where you are coming from. I am coming from somewhere else. >> PO: If you analyze what I am saying using conventional analysis then what I >> PO: am saying is incorrect. >> >> "Conventional analysis" is the only vessel which lets us sail into every >> imaginable universe such that we can be sure of anything. Those >> universes are the only "somewhere elses" we need. > > *Kaz cannot think outside the box* Nope; I don't want to think outside of the correctness box, if I can help it. Only by accident. The box where I exactly understand the definition of the problem and all of its constraints, so that I'm addressing myself to the problem and not something sort of resembling it, and the box in which I avoid magical/wishful thinking. > Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, named after mathematicians Ernst Zermelo > and Abraham Fraenkel > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%E2%80%93Fraenkel_set_theory > > Could think outside the box, otherwise Russell's Paradox > would still prove undecidability. 1. Meaningless appeal to authority. 2. While we are appealing to authorities, you are not worth a pimple on the ass of these gentlemen. What it means for you to think outside the box is qualitatively different from how they thought outside of the box. >> PO: The whole diagonalization thing is gibberish to me unless it only shows Great, quote yourself being an idiot some years ago! Yay! > Welcome to SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 7.6.4) > SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software. > Please run ?- license. for legal details. > > % This sentence is not true. > ?- LP = not(true(LP)). Not an example of diagonalization; the Liar Paradox is not a diagonal argument. Diagonal arguemnts patterned after Cantor do not exhibit a problem that is analogous to the Liar Paradox. So, indeed, yes, the "whole diagonalization thing is gibberish" to you. Or should we say, it is outside of your tiny box. -- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2025-11-28 20:41 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 02:58 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 21:25 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 04:17 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-28 23:05 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 05:52 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 08:20 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 20:39 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 14:56 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 16:34 -0500
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:16 -0800
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:05 -0500
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 16:01 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-29 22:57 +0000
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-29 17:24 -0600
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:08 -0500
Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot think outside the box Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-11-29 20:07 -0500
csiph-web