Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.postmodern > #1424
| From | pataphor <pataphor@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.postmodern |
| Subject | not sent to Jessica |
| Date | 2022-04-10 14:01 +0200 |
| Organization | postmodern |
| Message-ID | <20220410140130.13a5593f@freespace> (permalink) |
Thanks for writing this. As I like your writing a lot, I always wondered why you write so seldomly, but when you do write it's often more than I can consume in a single session. Moving towards 'automatic' writing, or whatever it is called, seems to be a worthwhile thing to try out. It is also my own preferred style, though there are risks and obligations coming with it. The more one becomes like a "flower from heaven" (sorry, I've been watching outlander) the more one becomes susceptible to outward influences, and, to make matters worse, the more one attracts these influences, contrary to what one might expect when writing the expected. It turns out it becomes less you who is writing, and one notices some divine influences taking over, which considerably increase the range and influence itself of what one seems to be writing about. Therefore one must strictly limit the influences one is exposed to, which one then also may unwittingly amplify, as there are many people that could take offence, seeing things that aren't there, or at least were not written by what you normally think of as your main identity. And they'll start interfering in obnoxious ways. Probably a good part of those are former flowers that were themselves interfered with, and turned into the opposite of whatever spiritual effect this was meant for. Since you seem to be adjacent to the rationalist community, they already are, or at least were some time ago, allergic to just ambiguous texts, while this kind of thing can go a lot further and would take a long time before becoming acceptable in such circles, if at all. Like it would be easy to mistake it for GPT, which it definitely isn't, at least if one practices some virtues. The same applies for talking about things like creating AGI with moral expertise, instead of using that topic for creating profitable fear factories around existential risk, related to what you were discussing earlier. One small last interference, this text seems to be lacking content, or maybe the form is the content, and you've already got farther than I ever managed to go :)
Back to alt.postmodern | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
not sent to Jessica pataphor <pataphor@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 14:01 +0200
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 10:45 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica pataphor <pataphor@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 21:54 +0200
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 14:06 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-07-28 12:39 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:57 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 12:04 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 17:28 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica pataphor <pataphor@gmail.com> - 2022-09-20 16:03 +0200
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-09-20 16:24 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2022-09-20 16:25 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-04-08 14:17 -0700
Re: not sent to Jessica Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 08:45 -0700
csiph-web