Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3756
| From | Carlos <carlos@cvkm.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Final request for feedback |
| Date | 2022-02-26 01:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20220226015615.00004dc5@cvkm.cz> (permalink) |
| References | <6211b169$1@news.ausics.net> |
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:11:37 +1100 David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> wrote: [...] > 3. I'm not storing the map in the font, but passing it as a parameter > to unicodeshow because I think it's simpler. Storing it in the font > means defining a new font (definefont). I think the map problem --how to get a good map, since the AdobeGlyphMap is insufficient-- is the key. The interface and/or implementation IMO is not so important (I posted an alternative implementation in another message--but it's still limited to the meager 4K+ glyphs in the Adobe list plus whatever extra /uniXXXX the font has...). C. --
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Final request for feedback David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> - 2022-02-20 14:11 +1100
Re: Final request for feedback luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 07:36 -0800
Composite fonts for Unicode strings (was: Final request for feedback) Carlos <carlos@cvkm.cz> - 2022-02-26 01:44 +0100
Re: Composite fonts for Unicode strings (was: Final request for feedback) David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> - 2022-02-28 21:39 +1100
Re: Composite fonts for Unicode strings (was: Final request for feedback) David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> - 2022-02-28 22:26 +1100
Re: Final request for feedback Carlos <carlos@cvkm.cz> - 2022-02-26 01:56 +0100
csiph-web