Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! |
| Message-ID | <20210716142416.00003996@reddwarf.jmc> (permalink) |
| Organization | Jupiter Mining Corp |
| Date | 2021-07-16 14:24 +0100 |
Hi! All extant halting problem proofs appear to be predicated on a misunderstanding of the following contradiction: Suppose T[R] is a Boolean function taking a routine (or program) R with no formal or free variables as its argument and that for all R, T[R] — True if R terminates if run and that T[R] = False if R does not terminate. Consider the routine P defined as follows rec routine P §L :if T[P] goto L Return § If T[P] = True the routine P will loop, and it will only terminate if T[P] = False. In each case T[P] has exactly the wrong value, and this contradiction shows that the function T cannot exist. [Strachey 1965] T is indeed unable to decide P but for the wrong reason: T[P] is recursive which means T can never decide if P halts because T never halts itself; this mistake appears to have been missed by Strachey as the §L <- L loop can't ever loop due to the recursion. HOWEVER Even if we ignore the error of recursion it does NOT follow that for T[Q], T cannot decide if Q halts where Q is a program that does not reference T. [Strachey 1965] shows us that a decider cannot be part of or called by that which is being decided (a pathological program) and given this it seems to be unproven that a decider for programs that don't exhibit this pathology cannot exist. /Flibble
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 14:24 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 14:34 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 14:39 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:36 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 15:39 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 08:38 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 11:04 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 12:03 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 19:50 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 15:46 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 15:40 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 15:42 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 01:06 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2021-07-16 16:12 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 10:52 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 09:11 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 11:15 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:13 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 08:32 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 01:03 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-18 02:32 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-19 10:10 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-20 01:35 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-20 09:24 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-21 01:28 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-19 20:48 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-16 15:27 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 15:36 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 10:02 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-16 22:09 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 08:46 -0700
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-16 22:07 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 16:20 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-16 22:25 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 16:32 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-17 11:48 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:44 -0500
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-16 22:10 +0100
Re: Halting Problem proofs appear to be bogus! olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:32 -0500
csiph-web