Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39882
| From | Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: input/output parameters |
| Date | 2021-04-10 14:54 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20210410145443.bb0f41da9704506ada43c158@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <slrns4t8bk.4fd.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> <20210320145630.62e1c4dde277c68dcd052e3e@gmail.com> <slrns5c3vp.4lq.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> <20210321151659.57d54d5ac979fca6d77b0ba7@gmail.com> <6ea17aef-1a1a-4806-be70-edb109f3d2a2n@googlegroups.com> |
Michael Haufe: > Talk of a "pure" annotation comes up from time to time in > the design committee but practically part of the debate > is: why annotate if you can identify purity with program > analysis? Program analysis is desirable in either case, at least to make sure that the programmer does not misinform the reader and compiler by marking an impure function as pure. My point is that pieces of "pure" eval() code (including non-strict mode) can be considered compile-time macros. I still feel a cognitive dissonance, however, every time a compiler is mentioned for a language named JavaScript... -- () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-13 15:32 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-13 15:16 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 18:51 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-14 16:15 +0000
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-14 18:31 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 22:27 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-14 23:44 +0000
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-15 06:41 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-14 22:17 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-14 23:28 +0000
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-15 06:39 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-03-14 22:32 +0000
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-15 06:36 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 14:49 +0300
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-20 11:59 -0700
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-20 13:07 -0700
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-20 19:29 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-20 20:35 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-15 00:27 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-14 23:51 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 14:56 +0300
Re: input/output parameters Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-03-20 15:08 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-21 15:16 +0300
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-21 08:46 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 14:54 +0300
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-20 12:05 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-21 15:58 +0300
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-15 06:43 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-03-15 18:01 +0100
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-16 18:06 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-03-16 23:58 +0100
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-17 19:14 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-03-17 23:46 +0100
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-18 18:04 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-03-22 00:39 +0100
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-23 10:44 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-03-30 00:33 +0200
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-31 19:53 +0100
Re: input/output parameters Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2021-04-01 01:17 +0200
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-01 18:02 +0100
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 15:50 +0300
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-20 18:52 +0000
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-21 17:35 +0300
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-21 08:50 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2021-03-21 19:31 +0300
Re: input/output parameters John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-21 19:27 +0000
Re: input/output parameters "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-20 13:02 -0700
Re: input/output parameters Postiljon Petskin <yyyyyyyyyyyywwwww@zohomail.eu> - 2023-04-22 08:47 -0700
csiph-web