Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #150351
| From | Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards |
| Date | 2020-02-29 13:28 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20200229132854.5f5df09e2fb5a8fde7daab60@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <r31fnc$t6b$1@dont-email.me> <20200225141351.8b50facbd1498ce2848f12a1@g{oogle}mail.com> <r332f7$fe6$1@dont-email.me> <20200229011411.54de128ce87d9a3d980f22e4@gmail.com> <ZBg6G.370078$LY2.321760@fx23.am4> |
Bart to Anton Shepelev: > > From what you and others have written in this thread, it > > seems to me that C would be better if it implied an > > include guard by default for each header, letting the > > programmer occasionally to resort to the current > > behavior of C in the very rare cases when it is desired. > > You might need a guard for an actual header. But not > necessarily for an include file that is designed to be > included multiple times in a source file. > > C can't tell what is a header, and what is just an include > file. But the programmer can. And since, in your terminology, the majority of include files are headers, single inclusion should be the default behavior, and multiple inclusion a special case needing explicit indication. Ergonomy requires that the most frequest use shall be the simplest, shortest, and defaultest. -- () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 22:08 +0300
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 20:28 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-24 19:40 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-24 22:37 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2020-02-25 14:13 +0300
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 13:03 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-29 01:14 +0300
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-28 22:36 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-29 13:28 +0300
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-29 00:08 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-02-29 07:05 -0500
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 15:01 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 14:52 -0500
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 21:19 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 15:48 -0500
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 21:53 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 17:26 -0500
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 00:08 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 15:24 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 22:20 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 09:52 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 08:12 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 09:55 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 10:35 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 13:13 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 13:50 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 18:33 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 18:38 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 18:42 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 18:46 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-25 19:35 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 21:18 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-26 06:40 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-25 12:12 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-25 11:55 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 21:37 +0100
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-02-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2020-02-25 23:10 -0400
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-02-27 05:39 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-24 22:23 +0000
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-02-24 21:17 -0800
Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2020-02-25 13:03 +0100
csiph-web