Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #67200

Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage

Date	2018-12-10 13:25 -0600
From	Chuck Rhode <CRhode@LacusVeris.com>
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject	Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage
Message-ID	<20181210132520.2a136e25@quixote.LacusVeris.com> (permalink)
References	<20181206015827.EE6E8120079@fleegle.mixmin.net> <7ac41ff427ad3d5fe773e09d88f86ddc@dizum.com>

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:50:59 +0100 (CET)
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

> I love the Ricochet architecture.

> It cannot fail open as there is no other option to run it other 
> than though Tor.

> It is probably as close as anything else to metadata resistant 
> communication. And.. It is serverless. No servers to compromise 
> whatsoever. I like that.

> Downside?

> It's asynchronous ie; Live Chat. No offline operation.

I'd been hoping someone would chime in with a plug for RetroShare.  No
one has, so I guess I have to.  RS runs with or without TOR and
purports to do asynchonous messaging.

o https://github.com/RetroShare/documentation/wiki/What-is-RetroShare%3F

o http://retroshare.net/

o https://github.com/RetroShare/RetroShare/

The SourceForge links are deprecated.

- -- 
.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 36° — Wind SW 10 mph

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlwOvaAACgkQYNv8YqSjllLvvQCeL/48N24RnE9eMv3sf5FmQRZo
Q10An1FHA1vYoDxt8TheHe0Z6Y/mY8rU
=bnI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread

Richochet vs. BitMessage Hidden <hidden@nym.mixmin.net> - 2018-12-06 01:58 +0000
  Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Stefan Claas <stefan.claas@posteo.de> - 2018-12-06 09:24 +0100
    Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-06 12:31 -0600
    Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-07 05:33 +0100
      Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Stefan Claas <stefan.claas@posteo.de> - 2018-12-07 08:18 +0100
        Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-07 06:35 -0600
          Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-12-09 18:17 -0500
        Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-08 06:53 +0100
          Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Stefan Claas <stefan.claas@posteo.de> - 2018-12-08 08:48 +0100
          Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-08 08:11 -0600
  Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-10 12:50 +0100
    Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Chuck Rhode <CRhode@LacusVeris.com> - 2018-12-10 13:25 -0600
      Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-10 14:06 -0600
        Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-11 03:46 +0100
          Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 14:19 +1100
            Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 16:03 +1100
              Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 17:18 +1100
                Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-11 07:54 -0600
                Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-12-11 14:56 +0100
                Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 07:04 +1100
              Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-11 11:53 +0100
            Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-11 10:12 +0100
          Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-11 16:30 -0600
            Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage % <%> - 2018-12-11 16:28 -0700
            Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2018-12-12 11:09 +1100
              Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-12 08:39 -0600
                Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 06:52 +1100
        Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Chuck Rhode <CRhode@LacusVeris.com> - 2018-12-11 15:35 -0600
      Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-11 02:06 +0100
        Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Chuck Rhode <CRhode@LacusVeris.com> - 2018-12-11 15:20 -0600
    Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage "Nomen Nescio" <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-12-10 13:57 -0600
    Re: Richochet vs. BitMessage Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-12-11 03:13 +0100

csiph-web