Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.photo.digital > #203303
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing |
| Date | 2017-05-18 19:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <201705181942438623-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> (permalink) |
| References | <abcckh.ad9.19.1@news.alt.net> <abiapp.n9k.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| Subject | Re: what about an LMS spectral camera? |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2017-05-19 02:28:40 +0000, dale <dale@dalekelly.org> said: > On 5/16/17 4:23 PM, dale wrote: >> small enough to carry around? don't see the value of XYZ >> >> if you have LMS, should be able to come up with xy, upvp without XYZ >> > > all you need is higher resolution and the right filtration ... Why are you talking to yourself? -- Regards, Savageduck
Back to rec.photo.digital | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
what about an LMS spectral camera? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-05-16 16:23 -0400
Re: what about an LMS spectral camera? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-05-18 22:28 -0400
Re: what about an LMS spectral camera? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-05-18 19:42 -0700
Re: what about an LMS spectral camera? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-05-19 12:24 -0400
csiph-web