Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #105869

Re: lambda functions in C

From GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: lambda functions in C
Date 2017-03-12 16:49 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20170312164923.52fd303f6e69f497d6a2f63b@gmail.com> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <fdaa2ede-9861-4000-885f-f7c910ae5a92@googlegroups.com> <oa3hf7$iu1$1@dont-email.me> <oa3jp5$qak$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <20170312151057.b01ce5356d8f96a0ea2f19ca@gmail.com> <f8ab3f4e-3b9e-4338-8963-3e88e91e808e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:

> You need a car in much of the USA. In London it's mainly a nuisance -
> you can't commute in because there's nowhere to park in central London -
> so you need a pass which gives you unlimited free Tube (public transport)
> travel. Thus the marginal cost of the car journey is far higher than
> the marginal cost of the Tube journey. Then whilst there's a case for
> cars going to the supermarket, the days of the big weekly shop where 
> Mum bought food for the week for the family are gone.

I don't believe that the majority of United States citizens is living in the
desert even though the territory is vast. Most of them are urban rather
than rural and there are shops in every street corner to eat all day long.

You're right the cost of owning an individual car is high but not really higher
than public transports with hidden cost paid by taxes. Using an individual car
may not be good for the environnment or relevant with a little effort,
nevertheless the active pullution stem from the human life while the passive
pollution stem from the planet activity.

Actually nobody can really know if the climate change is natural or artificial,
thus pretending to save the planet (not humanity) with political measures is a
scam.


> Cars haven't "run their course", David Brown is right there. We're 
> just slightly past peak car. Total car journeys fell for the first 
> time ever in the recession of 2008. Whilst its back up, population
> has also increased. They'll slowly be edged out, however. I don't
> one but I cheat a bit because I use my father's for occasional 
> necessary use.
> 
> https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/transport/POST-briefing-on-peak-car.pdf

In fact, you still need a car because communist transport is not freedom or
reliable. However, you have the chance to count on your family whereas
capitalists would prefer to sell you an individual car sleeping in the garage
all day long after destroying your roots.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 10:04 -0800
  Re: lambda functions in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-08 18:20 +0000
    Re: lambda functions in C Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 11:12 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 11:36 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-08 20:43 +0000
        Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-08 21:55 +0100
          Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 13:18 -0800
            Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 12:44 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 13:03 -0800
    Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 11:33 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-08 20:46 +0000
        Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 13:25 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 13:55 -0500
        Re: lambda functions in C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-10 11:09 -0800
          Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 14:51 -0500
        Re: lambda functions in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-10 19:19 +0000
          Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 14:53 -0500
            Re: lambda functions in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-11 14:17 +0000
              Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 06:55 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 07:05 -0800
  Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-08 13:55 -0800
    Re: lambda functions in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-08 23:41 +0000
      Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-09 05:03 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-09 14:06 +0000
        Re: lambda functions in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-09 14:20 +0000
          Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-09 08:07 -0800
            Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-09 21:50 +0100
              Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 23:38 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-03-09 22:46 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:39 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-03-10 08:03 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:22 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-03-10 19:24 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 23:23 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-03-11 18:02 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-09 20:48 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:57 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-10 11:26 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 17:53 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-10 13:17 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-11 17:11 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-10 00:38 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:23 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-10 11:37 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-10 09:07 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-10 13:22 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-10 10:47 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-10 14:57 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-10 12:26 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 12:49 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 23:32 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-11 12:26 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-11 17:17 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-11 10:26 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-11 19:48 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-11 12:02 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 09:14 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-11 15:44 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 09:51 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-11 16:11 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-11 22:21 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-11 13:36 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-11 23:48 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 11:55 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-11 18:34 -0500
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:23 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-12 11:42 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 13:49 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 10:56 -0700
                Re: lambda functions in C jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-11 15:30 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-12 00:37 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-11 17:23 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-12 14:32 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:22 +0000
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 11:10 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-12 11:08 +1300
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 00:17 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-12 14:14 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-12 09:54 -0400
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:10 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-12 08:08 -0700
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 16:49 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-12 14:28 -0400
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 00:03 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-12 19:15 -0400
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-12 18:18 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-12 10:42 -0700
                Re: lambda functions in C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-12 20:53 +0100
                Re: lambda functions in C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-10 07:09 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-10 08:56 -0800
                Re: lambda functions in C GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:49 +0100
    Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 04:12 -0800
  Re: lambda functions in C Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2017-03-09 10:38 +0100
  Re: lambda functions in C Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 08:48 -0800
    Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-09 09:45 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:51 -0800
    Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:50 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-09 11:08 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:22 +1300
          Re: lambda functions in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-09 12:12 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 11:29 -0800
      Re: lambda functions in C Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 13:33 -0800
        Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 13:42 -0800
          Re: lambda functions in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-10 11:02 +1300
          Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 14:30 -0800
          Re: lambda functions in C Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 15:07 -0800
  Re: lambda functions in C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-11 21:45 +0100
    Re: lambda functions in C Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 06:13 -0700

csiph-web