Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #44682
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? |
| Date | 2016-01-08 10:19 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2016Jan8.111957@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <bvWdnQQARaR5EhDLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Jan7.093605@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <568e645f$0$23758$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <2016Jan7.143356@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <J5qdncTosM7boxLLnZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@supernews.com> |
"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>The reason is that not only that a do-sys may be a
>different size from origs and dests, but more importantly, the DO ...
>LOOP family of words has stuff on the Return Stack, while the indefinite
>loop words do not.
Yes, although that would not really be a problem with regards to the
specification: If we allow CS-ROLL to also deal with do-sys, and a
program makes use of that, there is the loop-sys around at run-time on
the irregular exit from the counted loop, and just like for EXIT
inside the counted loop, the program has to get rid of that with
UNLOOP.
Hmm, another way to deal with the loop-sys would be to consume it in
another counted loop, e.g.,
do ... while ... loop
...
do ... [ 1 cs-roll ] then ... loop
Here the WHILE jumps to the THEN in the other counted loop. But given
that this should work in Gforth and, to my knowledge, has not been
used, it will probably not be a frequent construct.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2015: http://www.rigwit.co.uk/EuroForth2015/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-06 16:28 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 17:20 +0000
Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-01-06 09:24 -0800
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-01-06 16:06 -0600
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-07 08:36 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-07 13:13 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-07 13:33 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-01-07 18:42 -1000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-08 10:19 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-01-08 22:09 +0100
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-09 16:51 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-01-09 19:49 +0100
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-10 15:44 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-08 11:22 +0000
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-01-06 22:33 -0800
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 22:47 -0800
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-01-11 19:46 -0800
Re: Is WHILE allowed within DO .. LOOP ? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 22:37 -0800
csiph-web