Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #45673

Re: Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort)

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort)
Date 2016-02-22 12:26 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2016Feb22.132624@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References <na80e0$ov$1@dont-email.me> <62b38622-4fbc-4d99-a93d-6c0933e54de5@googlegroups.com> <2016Feb20.121311@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016Feb22.085456@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <56cadd25$0$24128$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw


Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> writes:
>anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
>
>>An additional feature that Gforth does not have yet and that would be
>>beneficial here would be to have several dictionary section to which
>>code and words can be added alternatingly or at least in a nested way.
>
>But we have that! That is called wordlists and they are invented
>to deal with the situation of libraries that may or may not be included,
>and may or may not be used.

Wordlists don't allow you to, e.g., define new words in the middle of
a colon definition.

>If we assume dw01 etc, are facilities that can be REQUIRED
>this dw01 could contain
>REQUIRE ieee
>REQUIRE dw01
>..
>
>So in Forth the job would be done automatically.

At least in Forth as I use it.  But then there are those who say that
we don't need REQUIRE, because load screens work fine and require less
support from the Forth system.  So, if you have a system without
REQUIRE/REQUIRED (such as SwiftForth 3.4.8a), you could use such a
tool to create a file equivalent of a load screen.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2015: http://www.rigwit.co.uk/EuroForth2015/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Topological sort "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 21:11 +0000
  Re: Topological sort lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 23:41 -0800
    Re: Topological sort lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
    Re: Topological sort anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-20 11:13 +0000
      Re: Topological sort lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 10:39 -0800
      Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-22 07:54 +0000
        Re: Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort) Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-22 10:04 +0000
          Re: Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-22 12:26 +0000
            Re: Rosettacode topological sort (was: Topological sort) Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-22 13:28 +0000
    Re: Topological sort lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 01:12 -0800
    Re: Topological sort lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 10:56 -0800

csiph-web