Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #379460
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The fault in our computers |
| Date | 2016-11-06 17:24 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20161106172405.11e9b26f@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | <8fa783dc-7e00-4688-83a8-f21a908a3156@googlegroups.com> <20161106170342.45cada3d@maxa-pc> <a646edf9-231f-41dc-aa93-1affafa920fb@googlegroups.com> |
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 08:19:42 -0800 (PST) Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 1:03:44 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 07:51:12 -0800 (PST) > > Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In short, a big problem with modern computers is that they store > > > data and solve problems with it in two entirely different areas: > > > the memory, and the central processing unit (CPU). And all that > > > shuffling > > > > Problem is that on CPU die can't be as much memory as needed. > > It's not the CPU<->memory problem rather how CPU works... > > Yeah, yo got to forget all about the present hardware architectures, > be it x86 or Arm, 32 or 64 bits. Just build completely new computing > unit from scratch and write completely new OS for it from scratch. > No more hobbyware, DOS, GNU etc.... Perhaps it's easier to use what > has been already built in yo head! > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyenRCJ_4Ww > Brain is not digital computer. We don't execute algorithms... Thinking process is *not algorithm*, rather thinking process *creates algorithms*. I saw proof that there is no algorithm to make algorithms in 1987 by my mathematical logic professor... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The fault in our computers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:51 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:55 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-06 17:02 +0100
Re: The fault in our computers Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-06 17:03 +0100
Re: The fault in our computers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 08:19 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-06 17:24 +0100
Re: The fault in our computers John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 14:52 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-11-06 18:02 +0000
Re: The fault in our computers Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 00:17 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-07 07:40 -0600
Re: The fault in our computers Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-07 09:22 -0500
Re: The fault in our computers Bob Glennford <rigormortis@uymail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:19 -0500
Re: The fault in our computers Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-07 12:51 -0500
Re: The fault in our computers Bob Glennford <rigormortis@uymail.com> - 2016-11-07 19:43 -0500
Re: The fault in our computers fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 09:27 -0800
Re: The fault in our computers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-08 07:23 -0600
Re: The fault in our computers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-07 09:48 -0700
csiph-web