Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() |
| Date | 2016-10-25 16:18 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20161025161851.6d657301@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> (permalink) |
| References | <nuiv18$7cr$6@dont-email.me> <50ddf174-e477-4b57-b576-a17623b2ce68@googlegroups.com> <numo37$2l9$3@dont-email.me> <20161025071544.6dd3b8d6@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> <b1ed8ae0-cbfb-4e75-8db0-00a222660138@googlegroups.com> |
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:15:11 -0700 (PDT) supercat@casperkitty.com wrote: > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 12:15:53 AM UTC-5, Melzzzzz wrote:> > > I did some Google Search on this topic. Some claimed that CPU cycles > > > would be wasted if you called free() in your program given the > > > fact Window$ would always free the memory a program requested. :) > > > > > > > Hm, then GC wastes lot of CPU cycles performing clean up. > > Uh, no it doesn't. Any decent malloc() implementation on a Windows > machine will request memory from the OS in large chunks and then dole > it out to the application in smaller chunks. Calling free() will add > storage into a list of space that has been received from the > operating system and is available for future calls to malloc(). When > a program finishes, the operating system won't care about what the > program has done with its blocks, or what portions it had marked as > available for its own reuse. The OS will simply mark all of the > "big" blocks it had given to the allocation as available for reuse. > Although calling free() on every allocated block before exiting may > make it easier to diagnose memory leaks [if a program is expected to > have done so, but some blocks remain allocated, that will indicate > that something that was expected to have been freed, wasn't] and > while it's useful to allow programs to be incorporated into other > programs, for the scenario of a program being run from a typical OS > best efficiency would be obtained by not having applications > bothering with free() unless they themselves are going to have use > for the memory released thereby. I talked about garbage collector. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 02:20 +0800
VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-10-23 11:44 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 12:46 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 07:15 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-25 07:15 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 16:18 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-25 07:32 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 16:55 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-10-25 08:07 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-24 22:30 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 07:46 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-25 17:54 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-25 17:55 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 22:32 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 16:46 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 23:24 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 23:52 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-25 08:01 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 17:23 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-25 09:09 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-10-25 09:29 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 18:51 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-10-27 19:54 +0000
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-27 15:06 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-10-27 17:06 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-28 06:47 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 23:16 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-29 09:35 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-10-29 12:51 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-29 14:26 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-10-29 15:27 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-29 17:11 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-31 13:01 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-10-31 16:35 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:31 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-01 11:28 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-31 13:08 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-23 21:35 +0100
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 12:49 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 07:16 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 22:30 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-23 15:52 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 12:50 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 07:18 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 22:28 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 16:48 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 23:25 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 17:35 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 23:50 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-25 18:45 +0200
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 01:59 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-31 12:10 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:32 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-01 11:31 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 19:28 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-03 10:00 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 23:25 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-03 09:03 -0700
[OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 02:33 +0800
Re: [OT] Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-03 12:26 -0700
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 12:05 +0800
Re: [OT] luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:52 -0700
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 21:59 +0800
Re: [OT] Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-04 08:45 -0700
Re: [OT] James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-11-04 11:49 -0400
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 00:33 +0800
Re: [OT] Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-04 09:56 -0700
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 01:40 +0800
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 01:42 +0800
Re: [OT] Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-04 11:52 -0700
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 18:13 +0800
Re: [OT] Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-05 13:19 -0700
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:00 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-03 20:16 -0400
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 00:34 +0800
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-03 08:54 -0700
Re: VC++ 2013, malloc() and free() "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 02:31 +0800
csiph-web