Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) |
| Date | 2016-09-30 22:59 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20160930225951.11999acc7b62e59469f2b977@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <f8807ca1-a2bd-40d9-bc34-b987b9a1051f@googlegroups.com> <fc12f995-3362-4481-ae6a-798a4feeb5bc@googlegroups.com> |
Rick C. Hodgin:
> C is not a new language. Brilliant developers re-
> solved most of the development issues in the 70s,
> 80s, and 90s. And they were discussed ad nauseum
> in the 80s, 90s, and 00s. To find examples,
> search the comp.lang.c archives on Google Groups,
> find a C project and study its source code, look
> at the source code for the C standard library,
> etc.
I have seen many, and read some, books on software
design and the philosophy of programming, but they
all were rooted in OOP, e.g.
1. Clean code, by Robert C. Martin,
2. Object Thinking by David West,
3. Refactoring by Martin Fowler,
4. Code Complete by Steve McConnell,
5. and anytning about "patterns", as if they were
impossible in produral languages.
Where are books that answer the same questions from
within the realm of classical procedural program-
ming?
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 14:28 -0700
the main problem of this group (as i see it) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 17:00 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-30 09:45 +0200
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-09-30 00:51 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:47 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-30 19:06 +0200
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 13:00 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:02 +0100
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2016-10-01 10:02 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 00:50 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:45 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:59 +0300
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 01:18 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-10-01 01:37 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 07:47 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-10-01 09:55 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 11:04 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 03:06 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 03:21 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-10-01 05:57 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-10-01 15:08 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 18:45 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 18:59 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-10-08 12:43 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 13:22 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 14:48 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2016-10-08 15:37 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 03:01 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 03:24 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 03:41 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-10-09 11:21 -0400
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 09:00 -0700
Re: the main problem of this group (as i see it) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 16:28 -0700
csiph-web