Re: A GC proposal

From	Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: A GC proposal
Date	2016-08-06 00:28 +0200
Organization	albasani.net
Message-ID	<20160806002823.2c5c98b0@maxa-pc> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <1036d97e-fad2-48b8-ba6f-b46d77eb4e1f@googlegroups.com> <02e12ece-7664-4bb9-bf0b-7c9a4271a4f6@googlegroups.com> <no2rli$mjn$1@dont-email.me> <877fbvos8q.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <no32ij$hb9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:05:07 +0200
jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote:

> 
> Then, this GC would MUCH faster and simpler than the one of Mr
> Boehm's.
> 
> That is an impressive piece of software of course, but it has a brute 
> force algorithm. This one is much faster since it doesn't chase
> pointers blindly in all space but knows where are the real pointers!
Does that helps in case of swapping ?
Weakest thing about GC vs manual is when processes are partly swapped...
>

Thread

A GC proposal jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-08-05 10:34 +0200
  Re: A GC proposal Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 09:59 +0100
    Re: A GC proposal jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-08-05 11:29 +0200
      Re: A GC proposal Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 15:48 +0100
  Re: A GC proposal luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 12:18 -0700
    Re: A GC proposal supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-08-05 12:32 -0700
      Re: A GC proposal jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-08-05 22:07 +0200
        Re: A GC proposal Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 21:50 +0100
          Re: A GC proposal supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-08-05 14:32 -0700
          Re: A GC proposal jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-08-06 00:05 +0200
            Re: A GC proposal Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-06 00:28 +0200
            Re: A GC proposal Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-06 01:47 +0100

csiph-web