Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #41039
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain |
| Date | 2015-08-01 13:07 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2015Aug1.150722@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <op.x2l521tmyfako5@localhost> <u_ydnfHzbtp1SCfInZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.x2l72rt4yfako5@localhost> <6KmdnZR0sujkFybInZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.x2n7yms6yfako5@localhost> |
"Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> writes:
>Citing a few outlying cases of commercial Forth success doesn't change
>the fact that the majority of Forth companies died or that the free
>Forths are what survived and what people use. It's like citing Apple as
>proof the computer hardware industry from the 1980's is in good health
>today, when numerous other computer companies died or exited that industry.
The computer industry has much more revenue these days than in the
1980s, so overall I would say that it is a success story. I don't
think that Forth is that successful (not the same multiplication
factor in revenue), but I would not be surprised if revenue today is
more than in the 1980s (but I have no way to tell). For every new
technology there are lots of companies (startups) few of which exist
under that name a decade later; that's not a sign that the technology
is not a commercial success (nor that it is), just a sign that the
technology is young.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2015: http://www.mpeforth.com/euroforth2015/euroforth2015.htm
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-07-29 17:57 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain mentificium@gmail.com - 2015-07-29 18:36 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-07-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 01:40 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 07:11 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2015-07-30 09:39 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-30 21:22 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-07-30 20:56 -0500
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-30 22:05 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-07-31 09:47 -0500
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-31 23:57 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-08-01 13:07 +0000
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-08-01 10:37 -0500
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2015-08-02 01:46 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-08-02 07:55 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:06 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-08-04 08:10 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:05 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-08-04 14:21 -0700
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 18:24 -0400
Re: Open source CPU+open source toolchain Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-08-06 09:12 +0100
csiph-web