Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #312527

Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite.

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:06:40 -0400
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:

> 
> "Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message 
> news:pan.2015.08.05.14.31.36@localhost.localdomain...
> > On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:13:07 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Yet programmers who would wipe the floor with a dimwit like you
> >> manage to do
> >> "real programming" with object oriented languages every day.
> >>
> >
> > That's because real programmers wrote the classes that are then
> > blindly utilized by the pseudo-programming C# crowd.
> >
> > If a C# coder had to write his own classes ... forget about it.
> >
> 
> You didn't limit this to C# programming. Your idiotic claim was:
> 
>    > Coding in C#, or any other object oriented language,
>    > is *not* programming.  It is only arranging predetermined
>    > classes like a child will arrange toy blocks.
> 
> Note the "any other object oriented language" part.
> 
> So in your tiny mind the person who implements yet another
> string-class or hashtable is a "real programmer" and real-man. But
> the person who uses for example Java classes to build a transactional
> distributed data processing system isn't really a programmer.
> 
> In your world idiots who keep re-inventing the same wheel by writing
> more string classes, more collection classes, etc are "real
> programmers." But the developers who write Libre Office, GIMP, etc
> are not "real programmers" because they're only "arranging
> predetermined classes like a child will arrange toy blocks."
> 
> Like I said before. You're a clueless idiot. Plain and simple.
> 

Actually he is not. I know at least one C# programmer who is not
capable to grasp algorithm if there is no handy class around.
So actually if there is trivial solution to problem, such programmer
would rather use some complex class, which does same thing, but with
bloat, simply because he is not capable to come with algorithm.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 00:39 -0700
  Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 05:55 -0700
  Start Killer (StartKiller.COM) removes Win10's Start Button. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 08:26 -0700
  Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-04 08:44 -0700
  Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-04 17:07 +0000
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:22 -0500
      You don't have to use old code, you can/should rewrite it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 12:39 -0700
        Re: You don't have to use old code, you can/should rewrite it. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-04 21:20 +0000
        Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 14:46 -0700
          Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-04 17:53 -0400
            Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 15:11 -0700
              Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-04 18:57 -0400
                Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 17:15 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-04 21:00 -0400
                Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 18:50 -0700
          Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-05 07:56 -0400
            "The Bachelor" (on the TV show) is a prissy bottom. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-05 10:45 -0700
          Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 14:06 +0000
            Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:13 -0400
              Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 14:31 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:06 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-05 17:26 +0200
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:29 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 15:42 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 12:00 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 16:11 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 12:37 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-05 18:51 +0200
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 12:59 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-05 19:04 +0200
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 17:48 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-05 20:07 +0200
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 18:09 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:26 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 19:30 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-05 12:44 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 15:50 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-05 16:26 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-05 16:38 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-05 14:13 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-05 15:47 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:23 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:28 -0500
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 19:33 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:40 -0500
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 15:55 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 20:28 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:51 -0700
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 20:33 +0000
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-05 15:57 -0400
                Re: Trite Hedonism.  Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 17:09 -0400
                What's better: a pen or a pencil ?  Salvador Dali used both. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-05 11:17 -0700
                Re: What's better: a pen or a pencil ?  Salvador Dali used both. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:31 -0400
                Re: What's better: a pen or a pencil ?  Salvador Dali used both. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 19:45 +0000
                Re: What's better: a pen or a pencil ?  Salvador Dali used both. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 19:35 +0000
            Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 09:21 -0500
              Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-05 17:02 +0200
                Re: Trite Hedonism. Quite Trite. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:26 -0400
        Show us your source code. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 17:29 -0700
      Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 01:38 -0400
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 13:46 -0400
    Replacing Win10's Start Menu. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 11:31 -0700
      I'm watching you right now. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 14:19 -0700
        Ubuntu Spyware: What to do? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 17:41 -0700
      Replacing Win10's Start Menu. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 15:21 -0700
        Re: Replacing Win10's Start Menu. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-04 22:37 +0000
          I prefer no Jeff-Relf.Me! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 04:02 -0700
        Re: Replacing Win10's Start Menu. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-05 08:11 -0400
          Re: Replacing Win10's Start Menu. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-05 10:10 -0700
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 11:58 -0700
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 14:34 -0500
      Indirectly, you (chrisv) see my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-08-04 12:46 -0700
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-04 16:57 -0400
    Re: I prefer Win8 because, unlike Win10, it has no Start Menu. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 06:54 -0400

csiph-web