Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.jai-maharaj > #131808
| From | alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com (Dr. Jai Maharaj) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.security, alt.computer.consultants, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc, alt.jyotish, soc.culture.india |
| Subject | Can Freezing Features Improve Security? |
| Followup-To | alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.security, alt.computer.consultants, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc |
| Date | 2015-06-04 17:49 +0000 |
| Organization | Jai Maharaj |
| Message-ID | <20150604Va1MoCi19s@MyFF> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 8 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.security, alt.computer.consultants, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc
Can Freezing Features Improve Security? By Balaji Narasimhan Computerworld.in April 29, 2015 How many times have you found bugs and security flaws in new software, or have read about it? A developer does something that makes life easier for you in some way, but is it also making things simpler for some hacker? While I use some of the latest iOS apps on my iPad, there are some exceptions. For instance, I have installed -- without jailbreaking -- an old DOS Jyotish software from 1991 that I simply cannot live without. When people ask why I use such ancient software, I have a simple answer -- sure, I can get one of the modern Jyotish packages, but every new feature means new bugs, which can throw calculations out of sync and make predictions go bad, hurting my reputation as an astrologer -- not that this is great anyway. It is not correct for me to impose my opinions on others, but I have to ask this question -- should we, as an industry, say no to unnecessary feature additions? Adding features means that you have bloatware on your hands -- and this is in spite of the established fact that 80 per cent of the people use only 20 per cent of the features. Worse, adding features hurts security. How many times have you found bugs and security flaws in new software, or have read about it? A developer does something that makes life easier for you in some way, but is it also making things simpler for some hacker? A case in point is the recent flaw that was found in a popular open-source networking library that could allow attackers to snoop on the encrypted traffic of over 25,000 iOS applications. This is doubly shocking because iOS -- in fact, anything from Apple, including OS X, which is built on the venerably safe Unix platform -- is generally considered safer than non-Apple platforms like Windows. But a large number of iOS and Mac OS X use a library called AFNetworking, a popular open-source networking library. So, whatever safety you get because of the inherent nature of iOS or Mac OS X is negated by a flaw from an external source. Continues at: http://www.computerworld.in/opinion/can-freezing-features-improve-security%3F Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Back to alt.fan.jai-maharaj | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can Freezing Features Improve Security? alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com (Dr. Jai Maharaj) - 2015-06-04 17:49 +0000
csiph-web