Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #37304
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) |
| Date | 2015-03-16 19:57 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20150316195749.78c7e507@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1e41c6de-6868-423c-b165-bdaa8a089898@googlegroups.com> <5505669c$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <b704ee55-49b9-48e0-a70e-601a39e1db22@googlegroups.com> <5049b6e6-89d7-47ea-864f-50f706218381@googlegroups.com> <e33e374d-be8d-4d72-a0ed-45bc791c8277@googlegroups.com> |
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT) hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 9:02:55 AM UTC-7, novembe...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > Before you get too enthusiastic about adding WITH etc. to Forth, > > > you should ask yourself why Delphi/Kylix is dead, despite having > > > a big company like Borland pushing it --- maybe because this > > > stuff is a bad idea and everybody hated it --- could that be the > > > reason? > > > > If you look at the Embarcadero website, it looks like Delphi is > > alive and kicking. Kylix on the other hand appears to be abandoned. > > > > Just thought you might like to know that. > > Thanks for telling me about that --- I had never heard of Embarcadero > before --- apparently they bought Delphi from Borland. > > There is also the humorously named Lazerus Pascal. Lazarus is IDE for Free Pascal. Live and kicking, as well. > > A lot of people liked Delphi, so I'm glad they can continue to do > what they enjoy doing. :-) > > Kylix was likely abandoned not because it is Pascal, but because it > is for writing commercial programs for Linux --- this goes against > the GNU spirit, in which programmers have a masochistic desire to > work for free and give their source-code to the PRC. Nope. Embarcadero announced that it will support Linux as target platform, but product will not have Kylix name rather it will be part of standard package. Only thing that I see is missing is that Free Pascal does not supports 64 bit ;( But Lazarus is RAD tool, like Delphi.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-03-10 18:17 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-11 02:21 +0100
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2015-03-11 06:25 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-11 14:49 +0100
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-03-10 15:43 -1000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-03-11 10:05 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-03-11 13:48 -1000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-03-12 19:01 +0100
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Pete Brown <brown.peter@nospicedham.com> - 2015-03-12 18:09 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-03-12 23:46 +0100
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-13 15:50 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-03-13 14:24 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2015-03-14 18:17 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 06:30 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-03-11 03:16 +0100
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-11 10:18 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-03-11 09:01 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-11 13:16 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) november.nihal@gmail.com - 2015-03-11 08:03 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2015-03-12 00:57 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-03-11 18:31 -1000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-03-12 01:51 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2015-03-12 07:04 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 18:10 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 17:30 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 15:51 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 22:35 +0000
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 15:54 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-13 11:45 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 07:01 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-15 18:16 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 05:50 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 08:54 -0400
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 10:23 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) november.nihal@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 09:02 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 10:35 -0700
Re: Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-16 19:57 +0100
csiph-web