Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: harder case for optimization |
| Date | 2014-11-29 17:29 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20141129092148.611@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | <329933af-9991-4bb6-bb95-6c673cf3c72c@googlegroups.com> <cb55e90d-5aaa-4ca7-aeaa-b12e21f53877@googlegroups.com> <sIiew.50101$Au7.15036@fx28.am4> <0f03adc7-bf74-46e7-b4d0-1852b593676d@googlegroups.com> |
On 2014-11-29, fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> wrote: > from my experyence cpu graphycs for medyum (say 1024x786) or larger > resolutyons ys not quyte obtaynable or just not obtaynable - y cannot make > even any sympler thyngs work fluyd when symple clear_frame() takes 8-10-20 ms Really. I played Quake for a while on a HP9000/715 workstation at about that resolution. Ported it to the machine myself. The framerate wasn't great, but it was playable. Oh, this was in 1996. I don't remember which model of 715 that machine was but the highest one, the 715/100XC, ran at 100 Mhz, with 1Kb on-chip L1 data cache, and 1Kb off-chip combined I/D L1 cache. People watch movies on their PC's with software decoders for formats like H.264. Computing that many pixels in some way and pushing them to the frame buffer at a decent rate is certainly possible.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 00:42 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-27 11:34 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-27 13:29 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-27 05:58 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-27 06:36 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 12:26 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-27 22:07 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 14:49 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 00:05 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 00:46 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 00:55 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 07:20 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-28 00:41 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 01:54 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-28 02:19 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 04:05 -0800
Closed captioning (Was: harder case for something or other) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-11-28 12:15 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 06:11 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-11-28 12:18 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 04:42 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-11-28 16:37 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 08:48 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-11-28 16:51 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 10:38 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 11:34 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 11:21 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 04:23 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 13:58 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 13:46 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 16:25 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 08:18 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 20:17 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-28 08:54 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 20:22 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-28 11:29 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-11-28 19:51 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 20:58 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 21:03 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-11-28 20:11 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 21:31 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 20:06 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 17:14 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 20:54 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 20:16 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-11-28 21:56 +0100
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 23:37 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 23:54 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-28 11:01 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 23:52 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2014-11-29 02:03 -0600
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 00:38 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 03:12 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-29 12:09 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 04:18 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 05:22 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-29 16:58 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 09:35 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-29 10:55 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-29 21:00 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-11-30 11:25 +1300
Re: harder case for optimization BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-11-29 22:56 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-11-30 12:00 +1300
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 16:01 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 16:21 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 16:52 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 17:14 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-11-30 00:20 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-11-29 16:43 -0800
Re: harder case for optimization Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-11-29 17:29 +0000
Re: harder case for optimization fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 02:12 -0800
csiph-web