Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #2203

Re: Satellite A660

From Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at>
Newsgroups comp.sys.laptops
Subject Re: Satellite A660
Date 2014-04-23 19:26 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20140423.212403@tmsn.at> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <4484d948-d099-4997-95eb-044d0f2c6678@googlegroups.com> <litg03$slb$1@reader1.panix.com> <3eeeab49-6f23-45b3-ac89-d30f0df639ef@googlegroups.com> <lj3va1$a5d$1@reader1.panix.com> <36a2df73-e6fa-49c0-abfd-fe9590dee0aa@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


* andymhancock@gmail.com <andymhancock@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a text medium.  But the means by which many people access it are
> changing.  I wasn't kidding when I indicated surprise that readers
> can't wrap to window width (command line or not).  In fact, this still
> isn't clear to me.  That's why I thought that the rude and arrogant
> manner in which Dominic demanded line breaks was in appropriate to say
> the least, especially when he wants others to conform to his demands
> and it involves a commensurate sacrifice in readability for the
> wrap-to-window-width crowd.  Has he even explored the possibility of
> wrap to window width in his reader (which he hasn't specified)?  If
> so, why hasn't he described the problem?  This is not the kind of
> issue for which a good solution will be arrived by shouting the
> loudest denunciating beratement.  Furthermore, the 80 character length
> in composition isn't going to help with nested quotations, so you're
> eventually going to blow that limit anyway.

Oh Andy, so much troube just because of nothing.
I'm sorry if my initial comment sounded rude to you - I only read a
few of the replies yet but I get the feeling you must hate me as if
I would be your worst nightmare.

Initially, I wanted to drop a small fun based comment to the actual
thread's going to maybe get one poster more to produce some well
readable texting.

Meanwhile I get called pretty low and arrogant and whatnot from you
for practically telling you of too long lines (in a funny way I
think, but it might not be so funny to everyone - but still, I'm
only responsible of what I write, not what you understand or
interpret).

Besides all that, I did not /demand/ anything, you're way too much
interpreting into things that actually hold no value. I refrain from
guessing what might be the reason for that as you won't like to hear
it anyway. I can truly live my life without you breaking the lines,
it was a suggestion of mine this time and if you do like it do it,
if not do it not but stop talking to me from the side as this isn't
any nicer if you be honest to yourself.

Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-12-14 21:18 -0800
  Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-02-27 22:02 -0800
    Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-03-02 22:57 -0800
      Re: Satellite A660 Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 04:24 -0800
        Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-14 19:13 -0700
          Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-16 17:22 +0000
            Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-16 22:44 +0000
              Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-18 17:30 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-19 00:56 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-20 14:04 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-23 19:02 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:40 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-19 02:41 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-19 09:34 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-19 22:29 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-21 20:33 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 23:24 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-23 00:02 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:59 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-23 19:26 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:46 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-05-03 14:53 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-05-03 13:29 -0700
          Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-20 01:52 +0000

csiph-web