Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty?

From	Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty?
Date	2014-03-09 06:55 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<20140308224204.214@kylheku.com> (permalink)
References	<401aa474-05e6-4cf4-a3c2-5e2c2343157e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-03-09, partremmaps@gmail.com <partremmaps@gmail.com> wrote:
> According to the ANSI C Standard, may free() be an empty function?

Of course, this is an empty function:

  void free(void *ptr) { }

But just to be sure, that is what you mean, right?

I believe the answer is yes.

> A couple of people who are in the daily habit of giving C advice on IRC told
> me that even in these implementations and situations, free() may be an empty
> function and do nothing and still be standards compliant.

This is correct. To require free to actually liberate memory would mean that
an implementation cannot turn free into a no-op and provide garbage collection.

However, if an implementation doesn't provide garbage collection, and its free
function does nothing, that will obviously cause memory leaks in
C programs, and big, runaway memory leaks in some kinds of C programs.

This would simply count as a low quality implementation.

> Their reasoning is thus:
>
> "Because the C program cannot, using only semantics of the C Abstract
> Machine, determine that free() did nothing, it is therefore compliant for
> free() to do nothing even though it was passed a pointer to valid allocated
> space having earlier been allocated by malloc()."

However, a C program can bomb because it exhausted all memory, even though the
program meticulously uses free, and there should be plenty of memory available
for that program.

In the real world, that is a visible effect.

A C implementation can conform to the standard and be a piece of crap in all
sorts of ways besides this. Conformance is only part of the picture.

For instance, a compiler can be conforming, yet do things like generate code
which passes and returns structures in a global memory area. Users who expect
to be able to use that compiler to write re-entrant code in their OS kernel
require a compiler to generate reentrant code for call and returns. This means
that the compiler has to conform to an additional requirement which isn't in
the ISO C standard.  There are all kinds of requirements like that.

Diagnostics are an obvious area. A conforming C compiler can simply stop
translating and put out a message like "this translation unit requires a
diagnostic according to ISO C".  But, of course, users want to know what kind
of diagnostic, and in what line of code.  That is not required by the standard!

The ISO C standard is not (and is not meant to be) a complete requirement
specification for a useful implementation of C.

Thread

Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-08 22:08 -0800
  Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-09 06:55 +0000
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-10 00:47 +0100
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-09 22:37 -0700
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-10 10:20 +0100
          Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-10 08:52 -0700
          Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-10 20:51 -0700
            Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-11 01:08 -0500
            Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-11 12:52 +0100
              Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-12 00:09 -0700
                Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-12 12:59 +0100
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-10 09:01 +0000
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2014-03-10 15:56 +0000
  Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-09 01:11 -0800
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-09 12:39 +0000
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-03-09 13:05 +0000
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-09 22:28 -0700
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-10 07:27 -0500
          Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-10 20:55 -0700
            Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-11 08:19 -0500
              Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-11 23:22 -0700
                Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 08:09 -0500
                Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 11:29 -0400
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-10 07:29 -0500
  Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-09 09:14 +0000
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-10 15:33 -0500
  Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-09 23:05 -0700
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-10 07:43 -0500
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? gordonb.3qcze@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2014-03-10 12:05 -0500
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-10 20:16 -0700
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-29 16:27 -0700
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-10 21:48 -0700
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-11 05:52 +0000
  Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? partremmaps@gmail.com - 2014-03-20 19:14 -0700
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-21 03:25 +0000
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-21 20:58 -0400
        Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-29 16:11 -0700
          Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-29 22:27 -0400
            Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-30 13:18 -0700
              Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-30 20:49 -0400
                Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-04-17 10:52 -0700
            Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-31 11:18 -0400
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-21 03:31 +0000
    Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-29 15:39 -0700
      Re: Does ANSI C allow free() to always be empty? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-30 04:22 +0000

csiph-web