Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" |
| Date | 2014-03-02 23:42 +0100 |
| Organization | chaotic at best... |
| Message-ID | <20140302234229.022ac0c7.andy.k466@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <leiuhq$m2h$1@solani.org> <87d2iakhzx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <72ac723b-53f0-4e52-ae99-14b5b3263426@googlegroups.com> <87y50yyqjv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:16 +0200 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: > The women might well be hot, but each year's models will look identical. Oh yeah baby, twins! :) -- Andy
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-25 20:30 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-25 23:19 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-02-26 09:36 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" SlimmPickens <lachlanmoss@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 02:50 -0800
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-26 15:03 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 23:42 +0100
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-26 11:24 -0300
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:51 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 11:06 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 12:18 +0000
non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 15:44 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 16:58 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 11:05 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-27 12:22 -0600
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:09 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:39 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:50 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-03-01 04:59 -0400
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:43 -0500
csiph-web