Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #1888
| From | Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Re: Atari in receivership. |
| Date | 2013-02-01 00:25 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20130201002557.0bd44cc2@talktalk.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ke955b$b5$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1301292041150.89097@imac.dekay.sytes.net> <kedo5f$toq$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:30:42 +0000 Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> wrote: > Admittedly Infogrammes bought the rights because Atari had much > better brand recognition, but they also put Nolan Bushnell back on > the board. I'd forgotten that. He also tried to buy Atari Games at one point (either from Midway or when Warners sold it to them; I can't remember). > Also they haven't gone bust, they've filed for bankruptcy protection. > GM did the same thing and the US government bailed them out. > Unfortunately for Atari apparently the French government hasn't got > any money to bail them out with. True, but then administration doesn't always mean the end even without a taxpayer bailout. If a buyer, or new investment, can be found by the administrator, or if he can sell off loss-making parts of the business while retaining something profitable (or all three), there may still be a future. Attempting to save a business in trouble is what administration's *for*, after all. Vaguely on-topic, think of GAME Group: battered and bruised, but still around. For the moment. > For Speccy users it will be interesting to see who acquires the > rights, because among them are the IP of many the major developers > for the Speccy including Ocean, Imagine, Gremlin and a host of > others. If Activision buys Atari then the WoS archive is going to > shrink considerably. Also true. But one of the things the administrator might do to raise cash is sell that dormant IP. I can't imagine Activision being too interested in Ocean, etc. in and of themselves; they'd surely only get their hands on them “by accident” through buying the whole thing. It'd be nice to see one of the few remaining British independents - Rebellion, maybe? - pick one or more of these names up for a song. Hey, we can dream... -- Duncan Snowden.
Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Atari in receivership. "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-01-29 18:41 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-01-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-29 22:30 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-29 22:38 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. "Paul E Collins" <equi+web@cl4.invalid> - 2013-01-29 23:25 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-30 02:17 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-01-30 05:25 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2013-01-31 12:30 +0000
Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-02-01 00:25 +0000
csiph-web