Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #1888

Re: Atari in receivership.

From Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net>
Newsgroups comp.sys.sinclair
Subject Re: Atari in receivership.
Date 2013-02-01 00:25 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <20130201002557.0bd44cc2@talktalk.net> (permalink)
References <ke955b$b5$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1301292041150.89097@imac.dekay.sytes.net> <kedo5f$toq$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:30:42 +0000
Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> wrote:

 
> Admittedly Infogrammes bought the rights because Atari had much
> better brand recognition, but they also put Nolan Bushnell back on
> the board.

I'd forgotten that. He also tried to buy Atari Games at one point
(either from Midway or when Warners sold it to them; I can't remember).
 
> Also they haven't gone bust, they've filed for bankruptcy protection.
> GM did the same thing and the US government bailed them out.
> Unfortunately for Atari apparently the French government hasn't got
> any money to bail them out with.

True, but then administration doesn't always mean the end even without
a taxpayer bailout. If a buyer, or new investment, can be found by the
administrator, or if he can sell off loss-making parts of the business
while retaining something profitable (or all three), there may still be
a future. Attempting to save a business in trouble is what
administration's *for*, after all.

Vaguely on-topic, think of GAME Group: battered and bruised, but still
around. For the moment.

> For Speccy users it will be interesting to see who acquires the
> rights, because among them are the IP of many the major developers
> for the Speccy including Ocean, Imagine, Gremlin and a host of
> others. If Activision buys Atari then the WoS archive is going to
> shrink considerably.

Also true. But one of the things the administrator might do to raise
cash is sell that dormant IP. I can't imagine Activision being too
interested in Ocean, etc. in and of themselves; they'd surely only get
their hands on them “by accident” through buying the whole thing. It'd
be nice to see one of the few remaining British independents -
Rebellion, maybe? - pick one or more of these names up for a song. Hey,
we can dream...

-- 
Duncan Snowden.

Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Atari in receivership. "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-01-29 18:41 +0000
  Re: Atari in receivership. deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-01-29 20:41 +0000
    Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-29 22:30 +0000
      Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-29 22:38 +0000
      Re: Atari in receivership. "Paul E Collins" <equi+web@cl4.invalid> - 2013-01-29 23:25 +0000
        Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-01-30 02:17 +0000
      Re: Atari in receivership. "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2013-01-30 05:25 +0000
    Re: Atari in receivership. Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2013-01-31 12:30 +0000
      Re: Atari in receivership. Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2013-02-01 00:25 +0000

csiph-web