Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #16060
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom |
| Date | 2012-10-08 17:11 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2012Oct8.191146@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | <7xhaq645m0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <2012Oct8.160229@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <7xpq4tdldn.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <2012Oct8.180835@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <7x4nm5dja8.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
>> Given the separate case in the spec for Fizz Buzz, having a separate
>> case in the program looks pretty natural to me.
>
>Since you've already done both tests (mod 3 and mod 5), doing them again
>has a DRY problem.
What's a "DRY problem"?
>> |multiples of five print "Buzz". For numbers which are multiples of
>> |both three and five print "FizzBuzz". ...
>> Anyway, what is the specification of Fizz Buzz Zoom?
>
>Same thing, except additionally, if n is divisible by 7, print "Zoom".
>So for example, for n=21 you'd print FizzZoom, for n=35 you'd print
>BuzzZoom, and for n=105 you'd print FizzBuzzZoom.
Now maybe someone should write a blog posting about writing
specifications. Let me have a go at that. What you mean is probably:
Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 121. But for
multiples of three print "Fizz" instead of the number and for the
multiples of five print "Buzz". For numbers which are multiples of
both three and five print "FizzBuzz". For numbers which are multiples
of seven, print "Zoom". For numbers which are multiples of three and
seven, print "FizzZoom". For numbers which are multiples of five and
seven, print "BuzzZoom". For numbers which are multiples of three,
five and seven, print "FizzBuzzZoom".
Why did I write it that way? Because it's closest to the FizzBuzz
spec and also the way you wrote the incomplete spec for FizzBuzzZoom.
That spec naturally leads to a solution you consider "ugly". Now
maybe someone can write a less ugly specification, and maybe that
naturally leads to a less ugly program.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2012: http://www.euroforth.org/ef12/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-07 09:19 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-10-07 20:33 +0200
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-07 11:43 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-10-07 21:09 +0200
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-07 12:18 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom ouatubi@gmail.com - 2012-10-08 01:15 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 09:37 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom ouatubi@gmail.com - 2012-10-09 01:16 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-10-07 14:45 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-07 12:28 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-10-07 21:06 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-07 21:32 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-10-08 06:06 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-10-08 05:24 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-10-08 14:02 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 08:38 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 08:43 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-10-08 18:03 +0200
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-10-08 16:08 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 09:23 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-10-08 17:11 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-10-08 22:12 +0200
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 13:16 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Hannu Vuolasaho <hannu.vuolasaho@nospam.tut.fi.invalid> - 2012-10-08 21:06 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-10-08 11:57 -1000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 01:26 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom George Hubert <georgeahubert@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-09 08:38 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-09 09:03 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-10-09 08:44 -1000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-10-10 12:32 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-10-10 16:59 +0200
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-10-10 16:42 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-12 21:18 -0700
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-10-12 21:06 -1000
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-10-10 09:02 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-10-08 17:50 +0100
Re: Fizz Buzz Zoom Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-08 10:15 -0700
csiph-web