Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: bitwise operators(info) |
| Date | 2012-01-28 19:01 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20120128105837.64@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <chine.bleu-83BB34.16524127012012@news.eternal-september.org> <lnzkd81vqy.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <42dacbf3-7657-44e2-b9b8-1be8e49651f8@t8g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <0.e41cbc1eedd06ab4387e.20120128113315GMT.874nvg3vus.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <jg1fpk$s1q$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2012-01-28, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote: > On 01/28/2012 06:33 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Jan 28, 2:06 am, Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> wrote: > ... >>>> In fact an int is represented in binary on any conforming >>>> implementation; see C99 6.2.6.2. >>> >>> Only in the abstract machine. >> >> Surely that's a misuse of "only"? Something that is "only" true in C's >> abstract machine, it true as far as any conforming C program in >> concerned. > > No, things that are true in the abstract machine may be false in the > real machine. Perhaps: Things that are true OF the abstract machine may be false OF the real machine. Things that are true IN the abstract machine are true IN the real one. > All that's actually required is that the C implementation > produce the same results as it would if they were true. That's the whole > point of the concept of the abstract machine. Determining what the output should be is an overwhelmingly large and broadly encompassing point. :)
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bitwise operators(info) Ceriousmall <divadsmall@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 13:56 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-01-27 22:03 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) "Morris Keesan" <mkeesan@post.harvard.edu> - 2012-01-27 17:35 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ceriousmall <divadsmall@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 16:22 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Devil with the China Blue Dress <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-27 16:52 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-27 17:06 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 19:06 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-28 11:33 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-28 13:46 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-28 19:01 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-28 22:41 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ceriousmall <divadsmall@gmail.com> - 2012-01-28 21:19 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-29 02:13 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-29 14:59 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-29 10:51 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-01-30 10:25 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ceriousmall <divadsmall@gmail.com> - 2012-01-31 06:00 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-31 14:30 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-31 10:06 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2012-01-28 12:34 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-01-27 22:56 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-27 20:30 -0800
Re: bitwise operators(info) Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-01-29 09:27 -0500
Re: bitwise operators(info) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-28 05:16 +0000
Re: bitwise operators(info) Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-01-27 21:44 -0700
csiph-web