Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #423281
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.tv |
| Subject | Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics |
| Date | 2015-09-21 02:16 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1s54dc-n1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <P4ZKx.3315$qY1.757@fx17.iad> <i6l3dc-jlr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mtnfqt$c0v$1@news.albasani.net> <but3dc-jgs.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mtnhlo$c0v$6@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t4l0dc-5jh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation
>>>>of the RICO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> to deprive constitutional rights.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > By doing nothing more than saying stuff that's unpopular.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The Court would have to overturn almost 200+ years of 1st
>>>>Amendment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > jurisprudence to uphold the notion that the state can
>>validly hold
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > people criminally liable for deprivation of civil rights
>>>>merely for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > saying "bad" stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would highly depend on exactly who said what and to whom.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remedy for speech that is false is speech that is true.
>>>>This is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordinary course in a free society. The response to the
>>>>>>unreasoned is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rational; to the uninformed, the enlightened; to the
>>>>straight-out lie,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the simple truth. See Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357,
>>377 (1927)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Brandeis, J., concurring) ("If there be time to expose through
>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more
>>speech, not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforced silence").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The theory of our Constitution is "that the best test of
>>truth is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> power of the thought to get itself accepted in the
>>competition of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> market," Abrams v. United States, 250 U. S. 616, 630 (1919)
>>>>>>(Holmes, J.,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissenting).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 1st Amendment itself ensures the right to respond to
>>speech we do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not like, and for good reason. Freedom of speech and thought
>>>>flows not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the beneficence of the state but from the inalienable
>>>>>>rights of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> person. And suppression of speech by the government can make
>>>>>>exposure of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> falsity more difficult, not less so. Society has the right
>>and civic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> duty to engage in open, dynamic, rational discourse. These
>>>>ends are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well served when the government seeks to orchestrate public
>>>>discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through content-based mandates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. vs. Alvarez, 132 S. Ct. at 2550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "How can you develop a reputation as a straight shooter if
>>>>lying is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an option? Even if untruthful speech were not valuable for its
>>>>>>own sake,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> its protection is clearly required to give breathing room to
>>truthful
>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-expression, which is unequivocally protected by the First
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> United States v. Alvarez, 638 F.3d 666, 675 (9th Cir. 2011)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The person doing the tipping in an insider trading case who does no
>>>>>>>>>>>>trading can be prosecuted even though the tipster has done nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>but speak.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Under United States Code Title 18, Section 871 a person can be
>>>>prosecuted
>>>>>>>>>>>>for nothing more than speech.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You made me look it up.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not just any speech; it has to be mailed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 18 U.S.C. Sec. 871
>>>>>>>>>>> Threats against President and successors to the Presidency
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in
>>>>the mail or
>>>>>>>>>>> for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier
>>any letter,
>>>>>>>>>>> paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
>>>>threat to take
>>>>>>>>>>> the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President
>>>>>>>>>>> of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other
>>>>>>>>>>> officer next in the order of succession to the office of
>>>>President of the
>>>>>>>>>>> United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully
>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise makes any such threat against the President,
>>President-elect,
>>>>>>>>>>> Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the
>>>>>>>>>>> office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined
>>under this
>>>>>>>>>>> title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nope; "or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hate statutory construction. You sure that's not meant to broaden out
>>>>>>>>> what was being threatened, instead of relating to mailing? If that was
>>>>>>>>> meant to be any threat, what the hell is the point of addressing
>>>>>>>>> the issue of mailing it in the first place?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As people HAVE been convicted for what they said, but not mailed, yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As to why it was worded that way, likely because when it was enacted
>>>>>>>>in 1917 mail was a common form of communications.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're missing my point: If it's a criminal threat in ANY method of
>>>>>>> communication, then there's no purpose in mentioning the mails at all. The
>>>>>>> statute would attempt to make the letter illegal before it's mailed the
>>>>>>> moment ink is on paper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're missing my point: How that hell would anyone know what the thinking
>>>>>>was behind the wording 98 years later other than making a guess?
>>>>>
>>>>> Try reading the words for comprehension, like anything else.
>>>
>>>>Bullshit.
>>>
>>>>If it were that simple there would be no court cases attempting to
>>>>determine the intent of the original authors, and there have been
>>>>a LOT of those.
>>>
>>>>An excellent example is the amount of effort in determining the intent
>>>>of the framers in "A well regulated Militia".
>>>
>>>>The words "well regulated" and militia had far different meanings 230
>>>>years ago.
>>>
>>> No, they didn't. It's merely an old-fashioned term. It had a legal meaning,
>>> and quite a bit of discussion from Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 29
>>
>>If it was cut and dry why any discussion at all?
>
> The meaning of "well-regulated militia" wasn't the controversial part of
> the amendment. The legal controversy was whether "the right to bear arms"
> had to be read together with "well-regulated militia". It really was a
> case of poorly executed legal drafting, sorry, Mr. Madison.
So thus we have come full circle, through a long and arduous path, to
intent of the author.
Q.E.D.
--
Jim Pennino
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 10:50 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 14:53 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:33 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 20:03 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:03 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:13 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:06 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 23:04 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 04:48 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:08 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:43 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:54 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 15:51 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:03 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 22:16 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:35 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 18:12 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 12:54 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:30 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 22:23 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:10 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 22:33 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 03:09 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:45 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:35 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 00:20 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:20 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:28 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 18:18 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 11:31 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:50 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:49 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 15:49 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 16:20 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:53 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:08 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:17 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:36 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:34 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 00:00 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 00:06 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 02:16 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 02:42 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 04:57 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 05:23 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 06:13 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 13:18 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:49 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:24 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 06:14 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics puppetsock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 07:44 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 00:46 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:23 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:43 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 18:59 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 15:11 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 15:24 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 18:40 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:18 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 15:54 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:17 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:05 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-09-20 20:30 -0600
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:43 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 18:48 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:41 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:03 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:51 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:29 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:17 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 23:19 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-20 12:03 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 13:51 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:01 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:06 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 08:24 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 12:04 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:00 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 07:42 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 15:57 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:27 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 17:27 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 20:53 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:25 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-20 10:52 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:30 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 16:13 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:21 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:28 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:54 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 22:32 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-09-20 06:01 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 11:47 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 16:55 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:56 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:35 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 03:31 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:09 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-20 11:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 13:54 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:55 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:05 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:53 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-22 10:30 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 19:07 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 14:55 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 14:58 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-23 18:38 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 16:18 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 20:34 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 17:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 13:07 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 15:09 -0600
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-21 01:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 10:26 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 17:51 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 12:59 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 23:03 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics patmpowers@gmail.com - 2015-09-18 12:38 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics patmpowers@gmail.com - 2015-09-19 20:40 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Persecute Global Warming Skeptics Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2015-09-22 19:48 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Persecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-23 12:06 -0700
csiph-web