Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #555015
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? |
| Date | 2016-02-20 19:27 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1armpc-55f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tp7lpc-6r9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <fa3ce98e-d66b-4ce3-8130-bc0d72821d15@googlegroups.com> <fbglpc-5ma.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <99070ff9-d98b-484e-b54e-27d5a8ca5228@googlegroups.com> <04f9cbee-bfbc-4918-9cb1-24df8070e31e@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 7:28:20 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: >> Jim...@specsol.spam.sux.com >> - show quoted text - >> On the contrary, I have presented several: >> >> Plasma does not generally exist in the Earth's atmosphere. >> >> Experiments to measure the density of air under various conditions are >> commonly done in both high school and college courses; the results are >> always the same. > > There is zero data indicating the existence of cold steam. That is but a mass delusion. All you retards have is anecdote. No data. On the contrary, there is lots of data but you refuse to look at it. That is a common defense mechanizm for the delusional. >> >> You have a delusional fixation. >> ------------- >> >> I suppose lightning may be classified as a plasma if you stretch the definition a bit. > > Plasma is't a thing. It's a state of matter. Only simpletons use make arguments based on dictionary definitions. To be precise, a lightning strike can generate a plasma for a very short period of time, but such does not generally occur in the atmosphere. > Our atmosphere is a slight plasma. Moist air is a slightly stronger plasma. Wind shear produces a plasma that is stronger still. As I thought, you don't understand what a plasma is. > Don't get your panties in a twist. A plasma is a plasma based on electromagnetic charges that exists between the molecules. It's no big deal. > > Fire is a plasma. Nope. > > Sheep have difficulty thinking outside the box. You are a sheep. The delusional refuses to actually look at reality. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:41 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 21:16 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:12 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 23:35 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:48 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:48 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:14 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 07:28 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:10 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 11:15 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:39 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:27 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 14:31 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:23 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 11:39 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:47 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:09 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 11:19 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:43 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:30 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 13:39 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 14:32 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:29 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:31 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? dm <pippinese@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 10:22 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 10:44 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:33 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:23 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 07:57 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:20 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 20:37 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:57 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:34 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:24 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 19:47 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 04:49 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 21:09 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 05:58 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 22:53 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 10:07 -0600
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:24 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:40 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 20:28 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:23 -0800
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 20:39 +0000
Re: So, uh, what's the problem, fellas? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 06:32 -0800
fella said, "pi meteorologists walk into a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:45 -0800
csiph-web