Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #8789

Re: -- The Cancer of Faggotry

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"dolf" <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:uoGdnclgA-5ldOnSnZ2dnUVZ5sadnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 30/03/12 9:44 AM, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Now that's an unsound mind!
>>
>
> I've heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
> suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
> had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
> Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.
>
> Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking whore, 
> or self conceit a synonym for your shit?
>
> Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): "W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?"
>
> atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): "No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
> just dork talk!"
>
> dolf: "Karl you're a chook."
>
> Ish (m@g.net): "I thought so. What's the matter? Afraid of women?"
>
> Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): "Is exactly what 
> I am"
>
> Ish (xm@c.net): "You can't consider a faggot like you a 'woman'.
>
> Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
> necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
> Chauvinist!".
>
> denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): "You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
> you a 'woman'."
>
> dolf: "There's only one queen and that's Madonna bitch."
>
> Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): "Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up when 
> the trolls do."
>
> dolf: "Qu'est-ce? Aren't you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
> hospital." [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ? 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]
>
> What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
> historian Ernst Renan (1823-1892), known for the statements that a nation 
> is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on what the 
> people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently quoted or 
> anthologized in works of history or political science pertaining to 
> nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu'est-ce?]
>
> M (storm@c.net): "What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
> gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. Too 
> bad...he might have said 'Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame playing 
> with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.' Now THAT would be an 
> appropriate job for him."
>
> Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): "You don't understand yourself at 
> all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?
>
> You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
> conform to what you think is non conforming."
>
> dolf: "That Catholic bitch apologist Kristina Keneally is dismissing the 
> fact that religious unbelief and disbelief which are your matters of 
> conscious as indulgence and belief is also someone else's human rights 
> claim which you are diminishing--Keep silent you skanking whore because I 
> am speaking in judgement against your soul.
>
> Your fucked up Catholic Religious belief gives you, as an American 
> refugee, the right to Australian Citizenship and political party 
> privilege--But not Me!
>
> I accuse you of indifference. Stop buying your meat pies from Tony Abbott, 
> you are no longer welcome."
>
> Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): "Doesn't matter any 
> more.
>
> Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on usenet.
>
> Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye."
>
> I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
> undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
> Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
> autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by their 
> fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also called the 
> Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--it is therefore 
> dishonest to convey it as otherwise.
>
> Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012, 
> over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do note 
> as advice in which I agree.
>
> On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant's 
> recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction 
> made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the 
> frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales 
> Police Service and Saint Vincent's Acute Care Team have conducted 
> themselves in my affairs.
>
> Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a 
> submission to a Magistrate's Court in order to forcibly gain entry into my 
> apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and circumstances of 
> my psychological health--they again resorted to unlawful, threatening and 
> unbridled aggression in their conduct outside my premises and a week later 
> they murdered a Brazilian youth (certainly not a Brazil Holland hero) by 
> tasering him in a circumstance of mistaken identity over an alleged theft 
> of biscuits (a wafer perhaps?).
>
> This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had occurred 
> and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive conduct 
> against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of intellect, 
> integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy disposition. 
> This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted, prejudiced and rendered 
> toxic my living environment--goodness knows what monstrosity the 
> neighbours think of me.
>
> These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to give 
> any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to grant me 
> a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as being a 
> substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and the State of 
> New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to their culture of 
> disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I have therefore 
> terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and convey my goods and 
> chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000. Given this my book has now 
> reached a level of completeness. I believe that such actions by me as 
> public defiance of the State's conduct which I have taken with due 
> consideration as a calculated exercise of voluntary will accompanying 
> determined action against them, will invariably manifest a disturbing 
> effect and consequence upon their enjoyment as participation in any 
> further ANZAC celebrations.
>
> As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from their 
> persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties of my 
> intention to leave the State.
>
> This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of Private 
> Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine. There was 
> no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about my belief that 
> Kovco's conduct was deliberate and being passed off as accidental. His 
> making of a video record of his service was in itself an unusual act. I 
> formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by which he portrayed 
> himself that it seemed different to how other soldiers are normally 
> portrayed in the media.
>
> The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption of 
> determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about his 
> making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view he held, 
> that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were forgotten by the 
> general populace, who went about their lives as though they weren't there 
> and what they were doing wasn't important. He was in fact undertaking a 
> course of action which required complex processes that were not normal for 
> him. That his intention to have his body return on ANZAC day was a 
> dishonourable and opportunistic conduct as an attempt to impose himself 
> upon the State in a most undignified manner.
>
> That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and 
> money the Military Tribunals into his death were.
>
> Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about private 
> sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to ourselves, were 
> then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to dishonour a person's 
> dignity and privacy--That this was technically a rape because the sexual 
> act accompanied a video recording which was made against a person's will.
>
> Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?
>
> "We know what you mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite, errrrhm 
> semite.....Coz Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker." [7 March 2012, Shane 
> Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!
>
> "[With opposition] 101 [asks "Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its 
> hands in Australia?"] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
> Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> Semantics!
>
> In this regard, at about 1840 hours on 19 February 2012, I had two 
> uniformed police from Kings Cross, namely Constable Peter Mullans and 
> Constable Alex Dews attended at my home address with two plain clothes 
> persons. A female who identified as Cherie Jenkins and another male person 
> who showed a reluctance to divulge his name as David Manley.
>
> There was a reluctant and obscuring conduct by David Manley as a refusal 
> to convey to me his identity in my own home. This antagonism towards me 
> within my own home, demonstrated to me that there was here a committed and 
> determined agenda of which I was not being fully informed of.
>
> I asked him upon what evidence as the grounds are they now reliant to 
> substantiate the claim that my conduct of 16 February 2012 constituted a 
> psychotic behaviour needing intervention as Dr Mark Bloch also improperly 
> asserted on that occasion.
>
> I denied that my conduct was in any way aggressive and I produced to those 
> persons a medical record made by Dr. Diane Williams following my 
> attendance at the Sydney Hospital on 18 February 2012 following a 
> pedestrian/motor vehicle accident earlier that day which recorded the 
> following observations: "Calm and cooperative, answering questions 
> appropriately, alert and oriented."
>
> As a consequence of David Manley's brief but uninformed statements about 
> my swollen left ankle which was injured by the car accident on 18 February 
> 2012, I at my earliest convenience the next day at 8:00am, again attended 
> at the Sydney Hospital with the view of obtaining x-rays and there was no 
> evidence of acute fracture and a simple analgesia as paracetamol/ibuprofen 
> was recommended.
>
> I also refused their request to further assessment as unnecessary as I 
> have full private medical insurance have an implied freedom to choose my 
> own doctor. I advised that I was under the regular care of a doctor for 
> which there existed a treatment plan and that my next appointment was 
> scheduled for the 28 February 2012 whereupon I was expectant to have my 
> stitches removed from my head.
>
> Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as Implied by Human Speech
> I asked them if they wished to take a look at the current focus of my 
> informal research activity involving making a determination of 
> consciousness and cognitive intent which is implied by human speech. 
> However they declined this offer on the grounds that they were not 
> psychiatrists and therefore not equipped to examine any paradigms of mind. 
> As there were no continuing grounds for their involvement they left and I 
> then illustrated the feasibility of obtaining an idea of cognition and 
> conscious intent from narrative by memeBraining the statement I had made 
> to Constable Mullans previously:
>
> "11 March 2012
>
> Dear Steve Jobs,
>
> I know that the iPhone 4S contract with Telstra, Sydney Australia was 
> entered into on 14 October 2011 being some matter of days after your death 
> 5 October 2011--were you buried by then?
>
> Today I went to the Apple Store and Telstra Store in Sydney and lamented 
> how the screen which was now cracked, and unable to keep up with the 
> rigours my life demanded.
>
> Of necessity on 18 February 2012, as the police statement of the day 
> conveys. I as a pedestrian faced with a driver determined and no intent to 
> stop, despite my motioning to so do. Found recourse, as an act of self 
> preservation, in grappling the bonnet of the moving vehicle.
>
> It took me 200 metres down the street of Darlinghurst Rd, Bayswater Rd 
> Kings Cross before I got off the car--he never stopped to let me though.
>
> The iPhone (it may have been in my rear pocket or it could have been in my 
> hand) didn't leave my presence of being--I wanted to know what guarantee 
> of warranty I had hereafter.
>
> I feel let down today by those who represented you and I am inclined by an 
> economic prospect of terminating the contract with the telecommunications 
> supplier as a more sensible thing to do--rather than getting a new iPhone.
>
> I'll put you in a box, which I still kept from the day of the sale.
>
> And go with your competitor."
>
> I recently said to Sergeant Kate Baker of the NSW Police that with all due 
> respect I was a brevet Sergeant of Police at 24 years of age. And that the 
> name dolf had been adopted (as an identity because of legislative changes 
> which allowed name changes on the birth certificate) whilst a member of 
> the police service within the computer services division--it was published 
> as such in the Police Gazette.
>
> I was the person who introduced the first six micro-computers into the 
> Victoria Police Service. That specialist areas such as the homicide squad, 
> were able to obtain any computing resources as their first computer, was 
> in some part due to ability by me to withstand any organisational 
> antagonism to the contrary.
>
> And the same goes for Victoria's Bureau of Criminal Intelligence as their 
> first network implemented by a Detective Geoff Woodrow (where is that man 
> these days?)--he deployed the DOS based application KnowledgeMan (Micro 
> Data Base Systems: mdbs) at my recommendation and I was most proud of his 
> abilities.
>
> That my present-day research into the existence of a noumenal reality (the 
> uncut block of Daoism or Celestial Hierarchy of Western governance and 
> religious belief) which was first surmised by Immanuel Kant. Actually has 
> its grounding in my former police service and interest in mdbs' other 
> product Guru as the bigger brother to the Knowledgeman application and 
> that being the notion of attributed time associated to consciousness, the 
> metaphysical origins of language having a cosmological basis as grounding 
> in the instance of time as rational PI (22nd Priestly service of GAMUL (a 
> recompense; camel) / 7 days of the week @ Equinoctial on Wednesday 20 
> March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 March 1996) / ENNEAD, and of a desire to 
> do further investigations into memeBraining a recent Statement of a 
> Witness document into Incident: E47210203 which was made to a Constable 
> Mullans of the NSW Police on 18 February 2012.
>
> I illustrated the feasibility of memeBraining the statement to get some 
> idea of cognition and conscious intent to Constable Mullans on the 
> following day when he further attended at my home address at 6:40pm.
>
> The view being, that it ought to have some relevance to the narrative 
> itself. Which he was at pains to ensure was not led by himself, but 
> articulated by me at his facilitation. And from there we ought to obtain a 
> very rich set of categories from which fuzzy logic tests can be made as 
> appraisals, to visualise the temporal areas where the steeping by osmosis 
> to inform the consciousness occurs within the time continuum and determine 
> whether it has any continuing empathy with the text of OATH (I swear by 
> Almighty God) being the Hebrew / Greek lexicon association by Strong's 
> Number to the actual Biblical Text.
>
> To this end, I have today purchased the following O'Reilly Publications:
>
> JavaScript Web Applications, (c) 2011 Alex MacCaw, JQuery Developer's 
> Guide to Moving State to the Client
> JavaScript, (c) 2011 David Flanagan, The Definitive Guide: Activate Your 
> Web Pages
>
> With the view of developing the memeBrain perspective by updating the 
> existing Grapple virtualisation cube prototype and functions to a 
> semantical equivalence as used by the JQuery Tool and to deploy it as a 
> layer to that architecture.
>
> And from a cursory read of JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, we can use 
> the enumeration() example to define our vMeme() as class object--this is 
> still work in progress, but none the less, the result of an enjoyable 
> afternoon:--
>
> /*
>     memeBrain:     Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as 
> Implied by Human Speech
>     Author:        Dolf Leendert Boek
>
>     Revision:     2012.02.22
>
> */
>
> // Example 6-1: Creating a new object that inherits from a prototype
> // O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:119
>
> function inherit(p) {
>
>     switch (true) {
>     case (p == null):
>         return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
>         break;
>
>     case (Object.create):
>         return Object.create(p);
>         break;
>
>     }
>
>     try {
>         if (typeof(p) != "object")
>             throw {s: 71, e: 14}; // Type Error
>
>         function f() {};
>         f.prototype = p;
>         return new f();
>
>     } catch (err) {
>         switch(true) {
>         case (err.s == 71 && err.e == 14):
>             return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
>             break;
>
>         default:
>             return {'15#69': "Unknown Error"};
>             break;
>
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> // Example 9-7: Enumerated types in JavaScript
> // O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:217
>
> function createMeme(idea) {
>
>     // Dummy constructor
>
>     var createMeme = function() {};
>
>     // Enumerated values inherit from this object
>
>     var proto = createMeme.prototype = {
>         constructor: createMeme,
>         toString: function() { return this.name; },
>         valueOf: function() { return this.value; },
>         toJSON: function() { return this.value; }
>     };
>
>     // Set the enumerated value data objects
>
>     createMeme.$names = [];
>     createMeme.$error = [];
>     createMeme.chronos = {};
>     createMeme.supernal = {};
>     createMeme.ego = {};
>     createMeme.male = {};
>     createMeme.female = {};
>
>     // Now create the instances of this new type
>
>     for (item in idea) {
>
>         var e = inherit(proto);
>
>         switch (true) {
>         case (typeof(e['71#14']) != "undefined"):
>             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['71#14'], ': 
> ', item].join('');
>             break;
>
>         case (typeof(e['15#69']) != "undefined"):
>             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['15#69'], ': 
> ', item].join('');
>             break;
>
>         case (item == "chronos"):
>         case (item == "supernal"):
>         case (item == "ego"):
>             e.name = item;
>             e.value = idea[item];
>             createMeme[item] = e;
>             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
>             break;
>
>         case (item == "male"):
>         case (item == "female"):
>             e._name = item;
>             e.value = inherit(idea[item]);
>             createMeme[item] = e;
>             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
>             break;
>         }
>     }
>
>     // A class method for iterating the instances of the class
>
>     createMeme.foreach = function(f, c) {
>
>         for (var i = 0; i < this.$names.length; i++)
>             f.call(c, this[this.$names[i]]);
>
>     };
>
>     return createMeme;
> }
>
> var vMeme = createMeme({
>     chronos: null,
>     supernal: 342,
>     male: {
>         vBronze: 21,
>         vPurple: 26,
>         vRed: 42,
>         vBlue: 52,
>         vOrange: 57,
>         vGreen: 39,
>         vYellow: 68,
>         vCyan: 31,
>         vCoral: 6,
>     },
>     ego: 249,
>     female: {
>         vBronze: 21,
>         vPurple: 5,
>         vRed: 16,
>         vBlue: 10,
>         vOrange: 5,
>         vGreen: 63,
>         vYellow: 29,
>         vCyan: 44,
>         vCoral: 56
>     }
> });
>
>
> Additionally I had contact by telephone from a person named Greg who also 
> purported to be a nurse from St Vincent's Hospital--however as it was a 
> blocked number I conveyed to him such anonymous conduct really wasn't in 
> regard of me.
>
> He again made the false and mischievous characterisation of my conduct on 
> 16 February 2012 as being threatening of Dr Mark Bloch and therefore 
> substantial--which I categorically denied. I said that I had demanded Dr 
> Mark Bloch give substantiation of what aspects of writing he found 
> objectionable and that his conduct constituted slander.
>
> Once again he was making scurrilous and fictitious characterisations as 
> distortions that he was projecting at me as traumatising and vilifying 
> conduct which had no knowledge of the substantive reality to the 
> contrary--that I had delivered letters to Dr Mark Bloch requesting 
> evidence of the heretofore non-existent grounds for my initial arrest as 
> involuntary lodgement and that in the real absence of those grounds, I was 
> intent on pursuing legal action and that they were appraised of my 
> intentions as considered actions to contest the veracity as lack of 
> truthfulness inherent in Dr Mark Bloch's characterisations of me.
>
> This same nurse again attended at my home in the company of a doctor 
> (identity unknown) at approximately 1143 hrs on 22 February 2012. We had a 
> further discussion via the intercom. I asked them to cease besieging me 
> and especially at home. As there was no immediacy as the substantive and 
> necessary grounds for their intervention beyond the fictitious and 
> pretentious claims of threatening behaviour which they have kept making in 
> the knowledge that it is false, as I have now repeatedly denied it.
>
> Or are you wishing to now assail me in relation to other events as 
> unwarranted and undesired further disruption and interference in my 
> preparation of argumentation for other legal matters associated with the 
> preparation of my book (as evidence in support of those legal claims) and 
> research undertaken over the last 16 years?
>
> I have previously on 21 May 2008 sought a voluntary consultation with Dr 
> Peter Sternhell who was a psychiatrist at Saint Vincent's Hospital 
> following a referral from Dr Mark Bloch--I did so in order to determine 
> the appropriate course of legal action and priority to take in a number of 
> complex matters.
>
> Whilst the psychiatrist was capable of making agreeable notes about those 
> matters which I would simply expand--his was a lack of awareness of the 
> details about my participation in the Kovco fiasco. Beyond acknowledging 
> my activism as having marked me out in some way, the psychiatrist couldn't 
> understand why I would be involved in a rainbow sash protest against 
> Kovco's effeminate conduct and by the same rainbow sash worn in protests 
> over refusal of Communion perpetuated by Cardinal George Pell in 1998 and 
> 2000.
>
> And hence he then made irrational and dissonant associations as my implied 
> lack of lucid connectedness and the cause for a social disconnectedness 
> between myself and Kovco which he described by a fiction: "Part of this 
> related to the recent death of Private Jake Kovco who had lived in the 
> same area in the same time. Mr Kovco made references to past childhood 
> sexual abuse and Aaron saw this as impacting on him--Aaron did not know 
> him personally, but felt that his in some way, impacted on him."
>
> As my twin sister and I am now estranged over this issue as my ANZAC day 
> protest and her siding with Kovco's mother whom she knows personally is 
> the reason I will not even attend her funeral should she precede me.
>
> The psychiatrist acknowledges the complexity of my unusual belief system 
> and the degree to which it affects his life, and on this basis he 
> considered me as having a delusional disorder. That is, he holds a very 
> complex system of beliefs that other people do not (or refuse to) 
> understand and which tends to impinge adversely on much of his life due to 
> his preoccupation with it. It also reflects his continuing antipathy 
> towards organisational religion, particularly the Roman Catholic Church.
>
> Much of the antipathy, of course, has a justifiable basis, eg: homophobic 
> comments that are made in that it conflicts with the Church's official 
> teachings, a lack of clarity over holocaust denial, Pope Benedict's 
> obscurity over the 75th anniversary when the office of Holy See signed the 
> Concordant with the German Reich.
>
> "Aaron spent much of today's interview telling me about the dispute with 
> the insurance company and referred often to a very complex philosophical 
> and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of number, 
> numerology, elements of Jewish Kabbalah, use of the lunar calendar and the 
> original Julian calendar."
>
> "Due to the complexity of his ideas, I could not follow his reasoning. He 
> spoke at length about the dispute with the Insurer and described, in part, 
> a very complex philosophical and metaphysical system that he has developed 
> that involves numerology, ancient texts, and ancient Chinese political 
> treatise including the Dao Te Ching."
>
> It is clear then that the statements made by the hospital's psychiatrist 
> are faulty, in being a conflict of values in support of the employer as 
> organisational religious ethos which fails to give any substantiation to 
> its prejudiced statements with respects to homosexuality and their 
> substantiated claims to religious belief as Christian identity and that 
> any reliance upon them is only based on hysteria--The psychiatrist 
> acknowledges that the "discrimination against me occurs because he is 
> Dutch and that people who are married with a religious faith are 
> automatically against him because he is also gay and HIV-positive. He held 
> these beliefs with absolute conviction."
>
> I also hold with absolute conviction, that any evidence of a ritualised 
> act of marriage associated to Roman Catholic (and other Christian) 
> religious belief by person's who have subjected me to any refusal as 
> attendance to my requests for action and closure in outstanding legal 
> matters--is to be now considered the prima facie grounds for any 
> prejudiced conduct towards me. You are not any longer free men in a 
> democracy but now slaves.
>
> That the complexity of my unusual belief system is exaggerated by this 
> psychiatrist because it conveys a description of a ternary system of 
> number as an alternative to the binary (heteros) apparatus as the 
> philosophical/theological basis to the ecclesiastical practice of marriage 
> used by the Catholic Church. That if the psychiatrist himself is married 
> within a religious faith which includes the rite of communion, then he 
> subscribes to an equivalent complex system of belief and idea as the basis 
> of delusion is not foreign to him--as he claims.
>
> Furthermore this complexity of belief which he claims is beyond his 
> understanding is equally a paradigm of mind related to psychiatry (and the 
> field of activity of the person for whom I wrote my paradigm), Godhead and 
> Governance of State and Church as theory of number and metaphysical 
> origins of language--my model provides a substantiation of Christian 
> identity and its perceived categories of the noumenal reality as a 
> technology which is entirely embedded within the Biblical narrative.
>
> As such St Vincent's Hospital is a Roman Catholic Institution which is 
> operated by a religious order of nuns in accordance with its Catholic 
> values as a claim to a complex philosophical and theological belief system 
> and the basis for their claimed Christian identity. The psychiatrist is 
> therefore disingenuous and fallacious in his claim of my having a 
> delusional disorder on the basis of holding a belief and value system.
>
> He would have us believe that whilst he organisationally participates in a 
> normality, which subscribes to a complex system of philosophical / 
> theological belief that he feels no obligation to describe or to 
> substantiate his understanding of (excepting as a paradigm of mind) such 
> belief and yet when I subscribe to an equivalent complex system of 
> philosophical / theological belief, this alternative reality he describes 
> as an incomprehensibility and an abnormal human condition.
>
> My statement of fact, which you misinterpreted as a claim, is not in error 
> because it describes reality.
>
> The subject matter, beyond the scope of belief, is not significant and has 
> no impact on the concept of belief versus an absence of belief.
>
> Your attempt to manipulate the words brings further question into the 
> credibility of your claim because you are confirming that you are having 
> difficulty with simple clarity.
>
> Saint Vincent's Hospital is hereby advised that I make a claim as a 
> homosexual to a complex philosophical/theological system of belief, which 
> is a substantiated claim to Christian identity that is fully and 
> rationally articulated. And which is not the basis of a delusional 
> disorder as this psychiatrist has falsely claimed as the cause for the 
> continuation of a culture of persecution as dominant character of life 
> within Australia--As the essential culture of opposition which is the 
> Catholic Church, its Institutions and its people as parasite.
>
> Accordingly, this psychiatrist and Saint Vincent's hospital are to provide 
> an apology for its past persecutions and it's traumatising effect and 
> those prejudiced actions by Cardinal Pell which have been directed against 
> my religious belief as philosophical/theological claim to Christian 
> identity and by that belief, I assert a claim to a sovereignty of autonomy 
> as a prerogative which is above that being claimed by any member of the 
> Catholic Church as their indulgence of a tokenistic wafer, as no communion 
> ever again between us.
>
> Theo Bekkers: (theodoreb@bigpond.com.au): "So it has value for you because 
> you do/don't, sort-of-might believe. That sounds very valuable to me. I 
> don't have a position on the taste of Yak milk. I treasure that 
> non-position."
>
> Pnyikos (nyikos2@bellsouth.net): "Oh, wait, I overlooked the smiley. What 
> does it mean in this case?
>
> If it means, 'My, that was quite a *bon mot*, as well as being right on 
> target' then my analysis stands."
>
> dolf: "And the wafer didn't crumble, nor was it sloppy when it was shoved 
> up where the sun don't shine."
>
> Zen teachings can be likened to "the finger pointing at the moon". Zen 
> teachings point to the moon, awakening, the realization of the nature of 
> reality, which is devoid of independently existing "things". But the 
> Zen-tradition also warns against taking its teachings, the pointing 
> finger, to be this insight itself:
>
> Wujin Chang, a nun, asked the Sixth Zen patriarch, Hui Neng, for help in 
> understanding the Mahanirvana Sutra. The master answered that he could not 
> read, but if the nun would read it aloud for him, he would do his best to 
> help her. The nun then asked, "If you can't even read the words, how can 
> you understand the truth behind them?"
>
> "Truth and words are unrelated. Truth can be compared to the moon," 
> answered Hui Neng, pointing to the moon with his finger, "And words can be 
> compared to a finger. I can use my finger to point out the moon, but my 
> finger is not the moon, and you don't need my finger in order to be able 
> to see the moon".
>
> This warning against confusing the finger and the moon resembles the 
> Diamond-sutra: [E]very disciple who is seeking Anuttara-samyak sambhodi 
> should discard, not only conceptions of one's own selfhood, other selves, 
> living beings and a Universal Selfhood, but should discard, also, all 
> ideas about such conceptions and all ideas about the non-existence of such 
> conceptions. While the Tathagata, in his teaching, constantly makes use of 
> conceptions and ideas about them, disciples should keep in mind the 
> unreality of all such conceptions and ideas. [Wikipedia 2012: ZEN]
>
>
> That the Roman Catholic Church and especially the religious order which 
> operates, the Saint Vincent's Hospital cannot now make any substantiated 
> claim of Christian identity in the denial of my own belief and that they 
> are to cease making such misrepresented and false claims. Of course the 
> consequence of this will be a collapse of the religious order which owns 
> the hospital and all its property holdings will in due course to be 
> forfeited by the Church and provided in compensation to me for the 
> persecutions made by the Roman Catholic Church, its Institutions and its 
> people.
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Hi!"
>
> dolf: "How are you doing?"
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "I'm good thanks. How are you?"
>
> dolf: "I've had one hell of a day."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Sorry. You ok? What's up?"
>
> dolf: "It's all in a day's work mate--I've just put an end to the Catholic 
> Church, and in so doing created the opportunity for the Commonwealth of 
> Australia to be a Republic by deposing the Queen.
>
> And nobody can say thanks!"
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Well that's a pretty kick ass day. I 
> despise both. So thanks from me :)"
>
> dolf: "You are welcome anytime--it's true I have done so.
>
> It's a shocking reality for them."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "I'm sure but you've done us all a 
> favour."
>
> dolf: "I spent 3hrs today pleading my cause in front of psychiatrists so 
> that they wouldn't lock me up again due to persecutions by a gay doctor.
>
> They did not appreciate that in justifying my claims over their wrongful 
> conduct, they then had a duty of restitution for such a crime and their 
> traumatising conduct in that perverse act."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "What can I say to that :)"
>
> dolf: "My love for them has gone cold."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Hehe me too now."
>
> dolf: "Not one of them has sufficient integrity for loyalty and neither do 
> I hold any dear enough to call friend."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Both are corrupt."
>
> dolf: "Each seeks after his own."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "For sure!"
>
> Tactical Advantage: "How was your weekend??"
>
> dolf: "Very productive, I was overcome by a revelation, which I was able 
> to put into words.
>
> Today I spent 3 hours with psychiatrists as Saint Vincent's Hospital, 
> pleading with them over my liberty so that they may understand the extent, 
> magnitude and gravity of my legal claim against the hospital (as a Roman 
> Catholic Institution) and of my authorities under the Commonwealth which I 
> have as a prerogative and the substantial (and not a delusional) reality 
> which others find most threatening. Their inability or refusal to meet 
> their obligations of substantiation to justify what is now considered 
> unlawful by them, has now given me the lawful ability to take a 
> determined, forceful and punitive action as retribution against them.
>
> I was able to walk out of the place happy in the knowledge that they are 
> at the very least aware of the trauma which resulted following my 
> experience of persecutions from Dr Mark Bloch and the hospital's 
> consequential besieging conduct. By happenstance, a consequence of my 
> being struck by a motor vehicle on the day immediately after such lawful 
> and considered contest against this doctor's deliberative distortions, 
> unethical and perverse conduct. Was the opportunity to obtain two 
> independent medical assessments to the contrary and in denial as 
> disqualification of Saint Vincent's Hospital's conduct. These alternative 
> medical opinions are distinguished by the absence of any reference to the 
> traumatic effect which was consequential to the sustained injuries and 
> clearly convey an alert, calm, responsive and considered disposition.
>
> The fascinating thing being, that Saint Vincent's Hospital was acting 
> outside the permissibility of authority which the legislation grants as 
> power to effect an involuntary admission. That in the circumstance of 
> having obtained two independent medical opinions within 24 hours following 
> a car accident, as the contrary evidence of a calm disposition and 
> refutations of any threats tendered by evidence as to the non-existent 
> basis of the original claimed intent. That they do not have an authority 
> to besiege or to detain me in such a circumstance so as to cause a person 
> to be traumatised by such unrestrained and frenzied conduct as theirs. And 
> in having established that such criteria for involvement as non existent, 
> neither do they have any imperative to compel me by a hand delivered 
> notice, of the mandated requirement for an attendance made on the false 
> claim of a fresh criteria for assessment. Which establishes that the 
> hospital, had no remaining impetus as legislative authority to detain, 
> summons me to attend or effect my involuntary surrender on what is only 
> inconsequential justification and rendered effectual by untruthful 
> obstructions made of the lawful cause and integrity of my action.
>
> On five occasions there were attempts to scurrilously characterise the 
> conduct of intentioned behaviour with fictions. That I tested the extent 
> of the voluntary freedom which I had available to me against their 
> discretionary use of the permissibility of authority under the 
> legislation. And I did so by standing up and expressing a need to 
> leave--which in being told that I could not now do and had to remain, 
> suggested clearly that I was being improperly held as misuse of the 
> legislative authority.
>
> I negotiated by verbal agreement, the terms of treatment for effecting 
> recovery as following: "They have agreed that my contesting the doctor's 
> conduct is without grounds for intervention by them--that matter is 
> closed. And agreed with my suggestion, that I have been recently 
> traumatised by actions of others and that I ought to enjoy 3 months of 
> tranquil intervention co-ordinated via my General Practitioner."
>
> This becomes a test of ethical conduct as to the compliance given by the 
> Psychiatry Registrar Dr Lyn Chiem and as the senior Psychiatrist Dr 
> McGeorge, who has now placed himself into jeopardy as loss of career and 
> as a matter of public scrutiny. And consequently, by letter dated 29 
> February 2012 they have convincingly failed to dignify their conduct as 
> being lawful. Their response attempts to obscure by designating as 
> "strictly private and confidential" what is of vital public interest. In 
> that it not only fails to convey what was "discussed and agreed upon from 
> that appointment" but attempts to re-establish the priority emphasis of 
> which party has accountability for co-ordinating that care: "You will 
> continue to engage with Vincent's Mental Health Services through your case 
> manager [.] and we will liaise with your GP." But Saint Vincent's Hospital 
> has now been delivered a fatal blow which will destroy their religious 
> belief and it will cost them $millions in compensation.
>
> My own doctor the next day, read the letters of demand which I made to Dr 
> Mark Bloch and queried why I had provided a copy to the Sydney Holocaust 
> Museum. In giving him a copy of my book on CD ROM, I remarked of my 
> capability to argue (as I do in one of my chapters) against the German 
> Philosopher Heidegger as the foremost philosopher of the 21st century. 
> Whilst the subject is too weighty and burdensome for 32yo SexyGerman79 who 
> fell silent, but had there been any infraction of Jewish sensibilities, we 
> would have heard the outrage. And there has been none of which I have been 
> made aware. He then brought up the circumstance of the recent and 
> extraordinary unrest as outrage which is promulgated throughout the Muslim 
> world--Well its already 10 years into the war, and the Americans have only 
> just now determined which "Shock and Awe" tactic was the most effective 
> way to prosecute the war. Then you simply just fuck them over with a 
> feigned sincerity as apology for what was accidental in action. But is 
> always known by its consequential effect and the reality of it being 
> viewed by others as an intentioned evil malice.
>
> Perhaps it is really just a consideration as evidence of the hypocrisy 
> which is intrinsic to Islamic religious belief, because there has been no 
> similar outrage about the sacrilegious character of my own cartoon and 
> surreal painting (self portrait) as a pillorying and polymorphic 
> crucifixion of Christ (1996). They may well find it one day, and whilst 
> this deification will surely offend Roman Catholics, who would consider it 
> a debasement of their most sacred symbols, and their cultural response is 
> a haunting reality which will never leave them. As they are entirely 
> adverse towards it as the single cause and a reminder to them for the 
> remaining term of their natural life, that theirs is a most certain 
> destiny and a rampage towards a final and an everlasting death. It is 
> entirely unknown as to whether this offends Islamic sensibilities to the 
> same heightened manner as the desecration of the Koran. It firstly 
> requires drawing their attention towards a knowledge of its existence, 
> before any determination of its effectiveness can be made:
>
>
> - http://www.grapple369.com/memeBrain_files/authorgrapple369.png
>
> Carnival {"A farewell to the flesh"}: Pillorying & Polymorphic Christ 
> (Pillorying and Atonement in Jewish culture) @ 9:41:50 AM 25 January 2012
> Image: 1996 Surreal painting (self portrait) Pillorying & polymorphic 
> crucifixion of Christ by (SOS) Sebastian Oscar Strensen
>
> "Those who attacked the Diggers' graves are clearly of the same ilk and 
> are obviously wish to resist the beckoning call of civilisation. Remember 
> when they hung that offensive Piss Christ photo at the National Gallery? 
> It was an image of a plastic crucifix immersed in the urine of its gutless 
> creator, Andres Serrano. The Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne George Pell 
> sought a Supreme Court injunction to prevent the picture going on display. 
> That failed, and Pell unhappily accepted the umpire's verdict.
>
> In Melbourne, two young blokes hit the picture with a hammer and, later, 
> it was torn from the wall. Pell condemned the attackers. Of course it was 
> grossly offensive to Christians, but they didn't set out to kill Serrano, 
> nor did he need to go in to hiding. It goes without saying that Serrano 
> didn't have the courage to do something similar to an image of Mohammad. I 
> wonder what might have been the reaction of Australia's rightly insulted 
> Muslims." [Some ungrateful Libyan Muslims desecrate our history, By Alan 
> Howe, Herald Sun 5 March 2012]
>
> I joked with him about what would likely to have happened yesterday and 
> whether I would have been involuntarily sectioned, if they had known, that 
> my singular intention was to effect a disdainful brutalisation of them by 
> the slaughter of the nuns who own the shop--And I proudly expressed the 
> view of its anticipated effectiveness, in being for them an especially 
> enhanced and grievous reality by virtue of the fact that the Catholic nuns 
> live within a worldview as delusional claim to superiority, where they 
> mistakenly believe there is no verity and surety greater to their own 
> belief. As they simply have no awareness of something much greater than 
> them. It therefore has the very real capability of manifesting a most 
> pronounced distress as uncontrolled anxieties and palpitations. A loss of 
> bodily function and breathing control, an incapacity of speech and most 
> probably resulting in death, as my intentioned act of a most discomforting 
> awareness of a loss of soul. A judgement and revenge made against them. 
> What do you think is implied by the claim that I would effect a collapse 
> and forfeiture by the Catholic Religious Order, who have no remaining 
> legitimacy within Australian life?
>
> I described to him, my well intentioned purpose, which I conveyed before 
> even beginning the 3 hrs of pleading my own cause of liberty with the 
> psychiatrists yesterday. I had sought to protect them (purposefully left 
> in draft disposition in that specific regard) in relation to the mechanics 
> of the document. And described it's capability for manifesting trauma as 
> notionally equivalent to getting on the cross with Jesus. And explained to 
> them that whilst no harm was being intentioned towards them. That should 
> their sensibilities be moved to an empathy with my representations, they 
> should clearly convey their free accept of it. The course of my 
> presentation, would then focus on how the methodology, as recourse to the 
> habitual use of obstructions, which move one towards the concealment of 
> any intentioned process and instead having a reliance upon scurrilous 
> distortions of any immediacy and capability for threat for actuality, has 
> a mitigating effect on the permissibility of authority under the 
> legislation.
>
> At one point I brought to their attention, the expressed need to avoid the 
> risky action of reading and consuming the document at too rapid and 
> careless rate. As you may unnecessarily enter into a painful anxious state 
> of fear which rendered them incapable of speech. That I was responding to 
> the outstanding matter of psychiatrist Peter Sternhell's slanderous 
> characterisations of the substantial reality, vital effectiveness and the 
> substance of my own religious belief. The improper, immodest and 
> blasphemous characterisation by them, as being irrational and delusional 
> was often repeated without substantiation by Dr. Meredith Stone (and I 
> have seen her with child). To whom I have also intentioned to effect a 
> similar retaliation against those persons, as a consequence to their 
> slanderous, false and haughty characterisations of me and my belief as 
> delusional and as cause for their sado-masochistic perversity to which I 
> was then subject to their pleasure and the pretence as beneficial claim of 
> a therapeutic process. In having furnished statements and these documents, 
> in substantiation of my legal entitlements and claim against Saint Vincent's 
> Hospital, theirs similarly, is now a requirement as an accord with 
> immediacy and a priority towards an unequivocal awareness, of their 
> obligation which is without any further grounds for delay, as a 
> requirement for them to provide an accountability for their actions and in 
> their absence any credibility as lawful criteria to provide an apology and 
> restitution for their past and continuing persecutions. And they will 
> afford me an appropriate and sovereign dignity in the acknowledgement of 
> the superiority and correctness of my substantial claim to Christian 
> belief and over that which was previously claimed of Roman Catholic 
> belief.
>
> That until they all expire, every remaining Roman Catholic, from this time 
> forward will afford to me an appropriate dignity as my entitlement which 
> is attained by the sovereign basis of my substantiated claim to Christian 
> belief and identity--such recognition of my superiority over the Roman 
> Catholic Church and its fraudulent claims to Christian identity is to be 
> accompanied by an appropriate gesturing as bowing in respect of my dignity 
> and a verbalisation which acknowledges the majesty of my triumphantism 
> over you all.
>
> "Stop bitching. Put in a complaint to HREOC based on lunacy/disability, 
> preferential Xment for Gooks." [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
> Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> You aren't worth quoting any further. The Human Rights and Equal 
> Opportunity Commission have not dealt honestly with the complaints.
>
> "My advice is EVERYONE agree what a loonie toonie yer are, yippity 
> yippider, thats all folks!" [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia 
> @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> Such gibber is pathetic: Is it possible that you enter into some realism 
> as coherence in concordance towards unity of being and complete a 
> sentence?
>
> And in the circumstance where there is a claim as deposition of the 
> Sovereign Autonomy (the Monarchy) made in relation to being Christian as 
> Religious Identity and their usage of marriage as the transformative 
> prototype and binary apparatus which is overthrown by a ternary number 
> paradigm as justifications for Gay and Lesbian Marriage.
>
> There is then the question above that of treason--as the theory proposed 
> that they have in the circumstance: NO IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION AND NO 
> PROTECTION AGAINST THE DISCLOSURE OF WHAT WAS HERETOFORE PRIVATE 
> DISCUSSIONS AS ORGANISATIONAL DELIBERATIONS.
>
> That my religious sensibilities have a priority as sovereign prerogative 
> that is above your own, which will cease and that you recognise and 
> acknowledge I possess an unprecedented authority under the Commonwealth, 
> to use whatever effective force to not only terminate any presumptuous, 
> arrogant and fascist abuses of my privileged belief, but to bring such 
> malevolence into compliance.
>
> I do intend to advertise for appropriate legal services--because I don't 
> wish to have my actions as lawful opportunities prejudiced any further. I 
> have at 0930 hrs this morning on 7 March 2012 sought legal advice in my 
> matters by making contact with a legal firm Maurice Blackburn & co--I only 
> sought that advice after first touching and saying a prayer at the Sydney 
> memorial to the Christian Gathering in 1788. However they have not 
> responded in a sufficient timeframe--and the offer is extended to which 
> ever law firm, possessing such necessary skills and being apprised of my 
> public statements about those matters, makes contact with me on my mobile 
> phone to establish an appointment.
>
> And again at 1335 hours on 7 March 2012 I attended at the offices of 
> Slater & Gordon lawyers with the view of making an appointment and was 
> told by the receptionist, that it could be made only via a telephone 
> enquiry. I think that such legal firms actively discriminate against HIV 
> infected persons. And I have raised that observation in relation to their 
> pursuit of Mesothelioma claims. And indeed I had some disparaging haughty 
> female lawyer attempt to disavow my use of the term "interrogation" to 
> describe the perverse conduct of Saint Vincent's medical staff.
>
> I was ushered into a meeting room by her and she attempted to connect me 
> via a phone there--however it appeared to me that this was just theatrics 
> and the line was silent, and so I indicated my willingness to return home 
> and make the call from there. I remarked about this rouse to a lady on my 
> out of the building, how uncivil I found this whole process as they 
> allowed no member of the public (as being too common, naive and perverse) 
> to come to their door.
>
> That's two law firms eliminated.
>
> What is it about honest weights in justice and a ternary conception of 
> Number that is so difficult for you? Mens Rea!
>
> I thereby have by such submission, a special Parliamentary Prerogative, in 
> having contributed my work in progress as notes of my complex system of 
> philosophical / theological belief to a Senate Committee Enquiry.
>
> That the Church then, it's Institutions and people have in unrestrained 
> prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such voluntary act 
> and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and Authority of the 
> Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia.
>
> And given an awareness of the consequence which have been my judgements, 
> there is a compulsion placed upon Cardinal George Pell should he return to 
> and retain sufficient bodily strength. If not he, then another who shall 
> bear it in his stead. For him to proffer a confession over their 
> transgressions as prejudiced sins committed against me and to make an 
> appropriate restitution by the provision of Saint Vincent's Hospital's 
> forfeited property holdings, as the bestowal of a compensation for the 
> egregious abuses committed toward me by the Roman Catholic Church, it's 
> remaining institutions and people--and the pervasive agreement amongst 
> Australians who expressed an apathy for change.
>
> And if all others are too terrified, their past impertinence now rendered 
> impotent of speech, then hear such an apology from the Pope this very day.
>
> And if this action of mine is effectual in it's undertaking (ie. 
> breath-taking), then there is no doubt as to the lack of truth in the 
> slanderous portrayal of my faith in God and his kind acts as watch care of 
> my soul, as somehow constituting a delusional belief (no-one had ever 
> given me praise, but only scorn for such belief) as the determined wicked 
> desire by others to dispossess me of mind, being and soul and any hope for 
> eternity. That such belief, indeed not only has substance, but is capable 
> of purposeful and directed action. Others who have outstanding matters as 
> failed obligations and duty towards me, will certainly now be moved to act 
> on those and to bring them to resolution--why did I need to ask more than 
> the once. Had there been by others, even a modicum of public recognition 
> as appreciation of my work--I would not have had to resort to the laying 
> aside of my pacifist values and its regard of life. So as to bring 
> sufficient action against your indifference, to grab your attention as to 
> the need to fulfil your failed obligations. And to remind you about what 
> you had forgotten and had no remaining intention or concern for. That such 
> action is not sport as an enjoyable pursuit. But it was a most arduous 
> thing, I have ever done. And mandated entirely by your own evil towards me 
> with a creeping consequence which was no different, other than my capacity 
> to be patient for a day of retribution against you.
>
> In the circumstance of Cardinal George Pell's committed grievous sin with 
> no opportunity for grace, I stood alone as the non-Catholic with others 
> who were, to endure their same scorn, and then waited over 10 years, and 
> heard not one voice from any other person who cared enough to plead their 
> cause as I have done, all that time as their faithful brother who fought 
> for them with God by my side and won it overwhelmingly, when they were not 
> capable of doing so for themselves. And in that respect, no one is capable 
> of condemning me for the actions I have taken because of your failure and 
> unwillingness to act.
>
> 17:09 (CST) hrs on 29 February 2012 @ WASHINGTON, D.C. (Reuters) - A 
> lesbian woman from the nation's capital wants a Catholic priest relieved 
> of his duties after he denied her communion at her mother's Maryland 
> funeral because she lives with another woman, she said on Wednesday.
>
> The local archdiocese has apologized for the actions of Father Marcel 
> Guarnizo, but Barbara Johnson, who is gay and lives with her lesbian 
> partner, said that was not enough.
>
> Guarnizo officiated at a funeral mass for Loetta Johnson on Saturday at 
> Saint John Neumann Catholic Church in Gaithersburg, about 25 miles 
> northwest of Washington. He told attendees that only church members in a 
> "state of grace" would be allowed to receive communion, Johnson said.
>
> Johnson said that when she approached, the priest covered the communion 
> chalice with his hand, "looked me in the eye and said 'I cannot give you 
> communion because you live with a woman.'"
>
> The priest told her "in the eyes of the church, that is a sin," she said. 
> She and her family told the Archdiocese of Washington, which has issued an 
> apology.
>
> Catholic church teachings condemn homosexuality, and the church considers 
> homosexual acts to be sinful. But the Archdiocese said in a statement that 
> questions about a person's right to receive communion should be addressed 
> privately and it was not policy to "publicly reprimand" worshipers.
>
> The Archdiocese would not comment on Guarnizo's status, citing the matter 
> as a personnel issue. Johnson said she does not want to focus on the 
> incident as a gay-rights issue but wants the priest to stop doing pastoral 
> work for the way he handled her mother's service.
>
> "We're urging the church to make that decision, so that this doesn't 
> happen to anyone else, to any other families," Johnson said. "It's the 
> right thing to do."
>
> "I think everyone has their gifts, and my family believes performing the 
> responsibilities of a parish priest does not fall under his list of 
> gifts," she added. [Gay woman wants priest relieved of duties after 
> communion, Joe Danielewicz, © 2012 Reuters]
>
> Mason Barge (masonbarge@gmail.com): "It's a comment on human nature, and 
> especially people posting on the Usenet, that so many non-Catholic people 
> should even have an op[i]nion about the people to whom the Catholic Church 
> gives communion, much less think their opinion is important enough to 
> share with others."
>
> Joan in GB-W: (jjkreus@aol.com): "It's a comment on human nature, and 
> especially men posting on the Usenet, that so many women should even have 
> an opinion about their sexuality and contraception. Let Rush lead them 
> into battle and forgive all of the partners of these young sinning women. 
> Gasp, and some of them might be or might eventually be your daughters."
>
> Bill Steele (ws21@cornell.edu): "It's a comment on human nature that so 
> many people posting on Usenet believe what they have to say is so 
> desperately important that they must cross-post it to irrelevant groups."
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Oh yes and that URL does not have 
> anything like that junk quotes above. Want to try 
> again.................... "
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Of course it does. It 
> supports every example I gave in my post. You being a verified dick 
> sucking ass fucked homosexual would never admit that though."
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Okay, but, with your permission, I 
> want to again try to disprove what I know are facts."
>
> Sbalneav (sbalneav@alburg.net): "Here's what [we're] talking about.
>
> Proof implies an absolute certainty that reality never can provide. This 
> comes from it's alternative usage in the mathematical field, where one 
> proves things. These mathematical proofs are absolutes. The problem is, 
> proof has multiple meanings. It can mean "evidence establishing a fact", 
> or it can mean "A logical or mathematical formal argument that shows how 
> conclusions can be drawn from premises". Or, more simply, one is based on 
> things in the real world, and the other is an intellectual exercise.
>
> Theists often either ask "What proof do you have that God doesn't exist?" 
> or say "I have proof that God exists.". In the first case, they're using 
> proof in the "evidence" sense; do you have evidence that God doesn't 
> exist? Of course, we all know that it's impossible to provide positive 
> evidence for something not existing. We infer it's non-existence from the 
> lack of evidence that we would expect to be there. There's no positive 
> evidence for unicorns not existing, there's a LACK of evidence that we'd 
> expect if unicorns did exist; no unicorn skeletons found, no reliable 
> eyewitness accounts of unicorns, etc. When, of course, we cannot PROVIDE 
> positive evidence that a God exists, they shout "AHA! So if you cannot 
> PROVE he doesn't exist, then he COULD exist!"
>
> When theists use the SECOND form ("I have proof...") they typically 
> present something that's less about evidence, and more about some kind of 
> mathematical or logical proof of God's existence. They'll give you the 
> Kalam argument, or an ontological argument, or a "Maximally Good" 
> argument, or something. When we say, "Yes, but that doesn't mean God 
> *actually* exists", they shout "But my proof is ironclad! It's logically 
> correct! It MUST be true!"
>
> In the first case, they want evidence from us. And if we say "Where's YOUR 
> proof God exists?", what WE mean is evidence. In the second case, they 
> bait and switch evidence for a logical or intellectual argument. In both 
> cases, they use the word "proof", but it changes it's focus from evidence 
> to logical correctness.
>
> So my point is; let's actually say what we mean. If what we need is 
> evidence that will compel us to accept that a position is true, then we 
> should ASK for evidence. Don't ask for "proof", or when they give you 
> Godel's ontological argument, you get sucked in to arguing math and logic.
>
> Using the Bible, Quran, and Talmud as examples, each of them makes 
> predictions that are TESTABLE in the real world. And by *testable*, we 
> mean things that either would have left *evidence* that we can find 
> (Global Flood), or can be tested today and should leave evidence (ask and 
> thou shalt receive).
>
> And as for [the] assertion that Science actually proves thi[n]gs, that's 
> just nonsense. I provided him with two separate links from .edu domains, 
> and invited him to talk to any university professor or, heck, go and grab 
> a book on the scientific method from a library. He, of course, flatly 
> refused."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Have [a go] at it, 
> kangaroo boy."
>
> dolf: "22 / 7 = You are a lying cunt {an unpleasant or stupid person}.
>
> Years ago, a mathematical prototype (as someone else's intellectual 
> property) comprising the initial four dialectic magic square strata to the 
> Grapple noumenon reality as alternative to the church's own historical use 
> of the celestial hierarchy was personally served on the Melbourne, 
> Victoria (Australia) arch-diocese of the Roman Catholic Church.
>
> How then are the Catholic Church of Victoria at War on Same Sex Unions?"
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "That goes to show what a low bred 
> uneducated idiot we are dealing with here."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Yes, you are correct in 
> your conclusion that my post shows, '.what a low bred uneducated idiot we 
> are dealing with here.' What else could be said for people who knowingly 
> and willfully spread a deadly disease simply to satisfy the sexual 
> promiscuity."
>
> Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): "Your understanding of 
> basic anatomy is clearly incorrect, for the opening at the lower end of 
> the alimentary canal in most species is insufficient for purposes of any 
> level of intellectual discourse."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Except when the bearer 
> is a male homosexual then it can speak, shout, send smoke signals, and 
> sign. However, its vocabulary is limited to two words, 'FUCK ME.'"
>
> dolf: "Hey Mr. Jingoist Kangaroo weren't you in Wake in Fright, how's it 
> hanging?"
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Crap and lies cut[.] O[h] M[y] 
> G[od] there is nothing left !!!!!!!!!!!!"
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Flatulence and asshole?"
>
> dolf: "Skunk and Pisswacker mate! Did I ever tell you about the time I'd 
> given Sophie Mirabella (née Panopoulos), as the Honorable Member for Indi, 
> a nominal sum of $200 plus GST just so I could get access to the Federal 
> Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock, who spoke at a Collins Street, Melbourne 
> venue on Islamic extremists?
>
> I mentioned to him my Grapple paradigm as informal research work in 
> progress on a noumenal reality and the belief that the circumstance of 
> public holidays (Australia Day, ANZAC Day, Armistice Day) emitted a 
> certain state of consciousness as character upon the Australian populace.
>
> I had slipped a couple $50 to assist in their auctioning bid for a bottle 
> of wine against Liberal stalwart John Elliot and with whom I later 
> discussed the opulent marble facade and rare timber paneling which existed 
> in the Port Authority building, where I then had an apartment.
>
> Money apparently buys access to the Liberal Party, but it was a legitimate 
> fund raiser amongst Party members."
>
> When is Cardinal George Pell going to begin his public repentance against 
> the prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such voluntary 
> act and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and Authority of 
> the Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia?
>
> My 27 November 2005 Rainbow Sash comments made on the public boundary 
> outside the Saint Patrick's Roman Catholic Church situated at 
> Maffra-Briagolong Road, Briagolong weren't reported in the press either. 
> Such protest was made against the Roman Catholic Church's similar lack of 
> regard for religious belief as an autonomous and sovereign Natural Law, 
> Common Law and Constitutional human right: "The Australian Catholic Church 
> appears to be advocating present day religious, political, organizational 
> and social values that on matters of sexuality and seventh-day Sabbatarian 
> Everlasting Covenant have not come to repentance on the denial of 
> Autonomous, Sovereign, Common Law and Constitutional Rights of others.
>
> Your claim to religious belief is by any objective measure intrinsically 
> morally disordered."
>
> Rule of Life (jjbruce@gmail.com): "It[']s bongs out back of parli[am]ent
> It[']s needles and hero[i]n in the [Q]ueen[']s palace
> It[']s a[mph]etamines round the world
> There was no-one else, dehon[ou]r and treason: At Her Majesty's Service
>
> The Crown will kill all homosexuals
> The Crown has acted out of order in allowing a gay race.
> I hold the right, Him Her
> It should be known that the world revolves around two people
> At anyone time male and female: The Influence
>
> There was no word in the stars to describe gay and homosexual
> And could not be used on Crown Notices
>
> It is against the law to use the word homosexual except here in.
> Homosexual is against the law.
>
> It is against the law to question: The Crown--God
>
> The one the girls sing about--You"
>
> dolf: "Wasn't the Pope recently asked on: 'Creationists need [for a] 
> Catholic vision'?"
>
> BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): "Lets hope the Holy Pontiff sets 
> many creationists back on the right path."
>
> Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): "It would be a great improvement."
>
> dolf: "He knows Greedy!"
>
> BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): "From what I understand."
>
> Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): "Which is nothing!"
>
> dolf: "Is it painful?"
>
> A letter of an outstanding legal claim was peacefully hand delivered to St 
> Vincent's Hospital on 3 March 2012 and following which a Rainbow Sash was 
> worn in a parade through the streets to advise all peoples of this 
> unequivocal association of claimed and substantiated Christian idealism 
> and Gay identity now being inseparable from the Commonwealth of 
> Australia's claim and advancement of ANZAC identity and idealism from 
> which such persons, by their continued antagonism towards the sovereign 
> autonomy of this nation--Are excluded.
>
> That hell is now the destiny for all of you, who are similarly indifferent 
> to your obligation and duty towards others!
>
> - dolf
> - www.grapple369.com/memeBrain.html

Cool. But it ain't baseball. 

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Cancer of Faggotry denis <mrwilson695563465346@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 12:22 -0700
  Re: The Cancer of Faggotry "M" <storm@c.net> - 2012-03-28 01:27 -0400
  Re: The Cancer of Faggotry pfjames2000@googlemail.com (Peter) - 2012-03-28 08:16 +0100
  -- The Cancer of Faggotry dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-30 08:58 +1100
    Re: -- The Cancer of Faggotry Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2012-03-30 09:44 +1100
      Re: -- The Cancer of Faggotry dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-30 10:02 +1100
        Re: -- The Cancer of Faggotry "M" <storm@c.net> - 2012-03-30 23:37 -0400
          -- The Cancer of Faggotry dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-31 19:31 +1100

csiph-web