Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #27692
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? |
| Date | 2015-05-16 18:06 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1973238.TzKXuHrKGN@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <mj7odj$ejr$1@dont-email.me> <1445670.lN8oQKCnmD@PointedEars.de> <mj7pf4$iar$1@dont-email.me> |
Leonardo Azpurua wrote: > "Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn" <PointedEars@web.de> escribi� en el mensaje > news:1445670.lN8oQKCnmD@PointedEars.de... >> Leonardo Azpurua wrote: >>> […] do most "modern" browsers (say FireFox, Chrome, IE9+, Opera, Safari) >>> automatically handle all the cleanup of a disposed element (detaching >>> event handlers, freeing graphical resources, deallocating memory, etc) >>> for all the elemets inside a disposed control, or is it necessary to >>> provide a function to handle all of it explicitly? >> Yes. > > :-) > > Ok... my wrong! I think the correct colloquial expression is “my _bad_”. > Yes, what? > Yes, they do properly handle all the disposal process? > Or yes, I must provide a proper disposal function? AFAIK none of the listed browsers experience memory leaks if you leave the clean-up to them. As that is a feature of the layout engine, this applies to all browsers using the same layout engine, and should apply to all that are using a layout engine that is based on one of the former’s. A statement regarding “most (modern) browsers” is untrustworthy. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:14 -0430
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 17:44 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:32 -0430
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:06 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2015-05-16 11:42 -0430
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:12 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-16 18:09 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-16 22:05 -0300
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-17 08:01 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-17 13:29 -0300
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-17 19:06 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-05-17 11:53 +0200
Re: Is it necessary to explicitly destroy elements? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-05-17 13:20 -0300
csiph-web