Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22804

Re: JavaScript unfairly blamed?

Message-ID <1877538.4En7Rhr0HQ@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2014-01-26 19:43 +0100
Subject Re: JavaScript unfairly blamed?
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <DOM-20140126091248@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <droleary-A8DAA1.11260426012014@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Doc O'Leary wrote:

> In article <DOM-20140126091248@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
>  ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:

It's attribution _line_, not attribution novel.

>>   Douglas Crockford wrote:
>> 
>> |The API Of the browser, the Document Object Model (DOM) is
>> |quite awful, and JavaScript is unfairly blamed.
>> 
>>   What's so awful about the DOM?
> 
> I don't think much about it but, really, the DOM *is* essentially a
> lowest common denominator representation.  I mean, in what other OO
> design would you mediate almost all object access via something like
> document.getElement...?  Where the HTML hierarchy is flattened to most
> everything being a single type of node?  It is a very generic,
> data-centric representation of a page.

ACK.  Probably because there are no pages.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: JavaScript unfairly blamed? Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-01-26 11:26 -0600
  Re: JavaScript unfairly blamed? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-26 19:43 +0100

csiph-web