Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400806
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World |
| Date | 2016-12-05 02:37 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <185135698.czGbrZyN6A@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <84027890-254a-44ff-8102-a157edd8ed9b@googlegroups.com> <o22bum$1sub$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
The ’nym-shifting troll trolled as "Yuette Sommerfield": > Pentcho Valev wrote: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuxFXHircaI >> Michio Kaku, Brian Cox, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Brian Greene, Lisa >> Randall: >> "Now, listen carefully. The faster you move, the heavier you get. Light >> travels at the same speed no matter how you look at it. > > Wishful thinking. No, the first one is just typical of the inaccuracy in *popular*-scientific statements combined with them being arranged as sound bites, for effect. The concept of a “relativistic mass” that grows with relative speed that had been introduced by others, had been deprecated by Einstein, and has been abandoned in teaching long ago (why some scientists would continue to disseminate this more confusing, outdated concept is hard for me to understand). Instead, mass is independent of the 3-momentum, therefore of the frame of reference and of relative velocity: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity#Relativistic_mass> So you do not “get heavier”, but you gain momentum relative to a frame of reference: p = γ m v = m v∕√(1 − v²∕c²) where m is your mass, p is your (relative) momentum, and v is your (relative) speed. Another way to look at it is your total energy E = γ m c² = m c²∕√(1 − v²∕c²). Your total energy relative to something else increases as you are getting faster *relative to that something*, i.e. as v increases (assuming v > 0). There are two interpretations of this, depending on the set of theories you employ: In classical mechanics, if your total energy increases, your ability increases to impart momentum and to do work on a system; so the forces between you and other things increase (F = ∂p∕∂t). In general relativity (GR), your increased total energy is a component of the energy–momentum tensor which corresponds to the curvature of spacetime around you (G^µν ≡ R_µν − ½ R g_µν = 8πG∕c⁴ T_µν, T⁰⁰ = ρ = ∂(E∕c²)∕∂V). An increased curvature of spacetime around you makes you travel less 3-space in the same time – it looks like it is harder for you to move; also, objects around you are increasingly forced to move towards you, following ever more- curved geodesics of spacetime, making it appear as if a force of gravitation between you and them is growing stronger. As for the second statement, it has been experimentally confirmed a thousandfold, if not more. And there are practical applications. > For whatever reason. They simply can't prove the above. When will you *ever* learn? Natural sciences like physics are not about proof, but about confirming or refuting theories that are models of the world, by experiments. Which *has been done*, and the two theories of relativity have been confirmed in every single experiment so far. > Required instruments are not available. Utter nonsense, as you well know. Just *this year* one of the instruments required (LIGO) spectacularly confirmed GR’s prediction of gravitational waves. *One year ago*, an instrument (Planck spacecraft) enabled scientists to determine the age of the universe using GR. *Two years ago*, another instrument (the LHC) that works based on special relativity (see “total energy” above) enabled scientists to find the elusive Higgs boson, confirming our models of the constituents of matter (QED and QCD) which also would give wrong predictions without special relativity. And so on. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity> > Theorists. Idiot. *PLONK* -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-03 02:08 -0800
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-03 10:35 -0800
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-04 00:38 -0800
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-07 06:18 -0800
Re: Past and Future Chantell Dillingham <intlii@dtilnignii.org> - 2016-12-07 14:31 +0000
Re: Past and Future "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 06:40 -0800
Re: Past and Future KronosPrime@outlook.com - 2016-12-07 06:43 -0800
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Yuette Sommerfield <fodedd@fodeddmmlemuole.org> - 2016-12-05 00:21 +0000
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-12-05 02:37 +0100
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-05 00:10 -0800
Re: Past and Future Are Happening RIGHT NOW in Einstein Schizophrenic World Estrella Batey <yeaetl@sryeaet.org> - 2016-12-08 22:02 +0000
csiph-web