Re: Déjà vu

From	Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net>
Newsgroups	sci.math
Subject	Re: Déjà vu
Date	2017-01-11 11:26 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<17ab05da-0e02-1683-6d0b-c157e232ff4e@att.net> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <537f9214-0e1b-4199-afdc-6b9d335b92e0@googlegroups.com> <72a7584a-fc66-2fee-2101-0c3052a5efb3@att.net> <a33710fd-9842-49ad-8fb9-394455ddda1d@googlegroups.com> <0de5d760-6ea2-7279-eafc-5becd3512159@att.net> <d9b53361-d83a-4b50-8e14-7bd6db3d3b34@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/11/2017 3:34 AM, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:48:54 UTC-8,
> Jim Burns  wrote:
>> On 1/10/2017 8:25 PM, John Gabriel wrote:

>>> Actually, it clarifies my standpoint exactly, that is,
>>>  there is no further discussion necessary because
>>>  the concept of infinity is bogus.

...

>> Since what I'm calling "infinity" (and also
>> "autosubbijectibility", FYI) involves the labels for the
>> naturals  0, 1, 2, 3, ... you apparently are calling
>> the natural numbers bogus.
>>
>> Did you want to call the natural numbers bogus?
>>
>> You seem quite fond of the classical Greeks.
>> Do you think that they would have wanted you to call
>> the natural numbers bogus?

...

> The derivation of numbers by Euclid is perfect.
>  You can't rubbish any part of it.

I hadn't planned on rubbishing any part of Euclid's work.

I hadn't thought that Euclid considered the natural
numbers bogus. Are you quite sure about that?

Thread

Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 12:34 -0500
  Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-09 10:08 -0800
    Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 17:18 -0500
      Re: Déjà vu genmailus@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 14:28 -0800
        Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 17:55 -0500
          Re: Déjà vu Me <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 17:12 -0800
            Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 20:55 -0500
              Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 18:08 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 23:08 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 10:55 -0500
          Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 05:13 -0800
            Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 09:49 -0500
              Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 07:44 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 11:45 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 09:51 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 10:33 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 10:35 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 13:00 -0800
              Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 11:05 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 18:08 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 17:25 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 01:48 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 23:24 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 00:34 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 11:26 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 08:55 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 12:13 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:20 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:22 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:23 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 13:11 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:26 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 13:42 -0500
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:50 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:58 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 11:01 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 11:03 -0800
                Re: Déjà vu bursejan@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 11:11 -0800
      Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 00:03 -0800
        Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 10:21 -0500

csiph-web