Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #155240
| From | Colin Macleod <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android, news.software.readers, uk.telecom.mobile |
| Subject | Re: Mobile USENET readers |
| References | (1 earlier) <116cho2$194ot$1@dont-email.me> <116cm3v$gik$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <116etnl$1v74u$1@dont-email.me> <116f2kb$2u8p$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <o7vn8lp4jvfatocvhh8s5mdjqfsflrttac@4ax.com> |
| Date | 2026-08-24 09:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1787564625-7@newsgrouper.org> (permalink) |
| Organization | You cannot be serious!!! |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> posted: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 07:12:11 -0800, Maria Sophia > <mariasophia@comprehension.com> wrote: > > >Jeff Layman wrote: > >>> In addition, there are web pages if READING is truly the only goal. > >>> <https://newsgrouper.org/comp.mobile.android> <== still works as of 6/2026 > >> > >> It's unfortunately not available in the UK unless a VPN is used: > >> "Blocked due to UK Online Safety Act" > > > >Hi Jeff, > > > >Oh, wow. Really? That sucks. > > > >What the heck is "online safety" when it comes to Usenet? WTF? > >They're idiots. > > > >I just looked and it works for me (in the USA, in California). > > <https://newsgrouper.org/comp.mobile.android> > > > >I'm going to guess that since porn is on Usenet (as porn is everywhere), > >that "the UK authorities" decided to lock up all of Usenet, in their > >infinite wisdom in applying their sick so-called morals to others? > > > Do you think that nobody in the UK is on Usenet? > > What happened is that some non-UK organisations thought it was easier > to block access to those in the UK rather than try to meet the > requirements of the Act. Newsgrouper.org is my site, I'm just an individual not an organisation with a legal team, and I *am* in the UK so it would be risky for me to ignore UK law. The Online Safety Act applies to all services accessible in the UK which provide "User to user" communication facilities. The requirements of the Online Safety Act are far-reaching but not very clearly defined, and the penalties for non-compliance can be severe. When the act was introduced I spent considerable time studying it. The official guidance produced by Ofcom runs to a few thousand pages! You are required to undertake and document complicated reviews of your service across many specified potential risk areas. You are then required to respond any reports of such problems and remove anything problematic. BUT you also have a duty to preserve your users' rights to free speech. There are no clear definitions of where the line between these potentially conflicting obligations should be drawn. To take just one example, the legality of "assisted dying" has been a live political issue here in the last few years. But aid or encouragement to commit suicide is one of the types of speech strictly forbidden by the OSA. It is easy to imagine discussion of the general question being attacked by opponents of assisted dying and reported as a violation of the act. So I reached the conclusion that the only practical course for me was to block access to my site from my own country :-( -- Colin Macleod ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ https://cmacleod.me.uk FEED GAZA NOW! SAVE GAZA NOW! HOUSE GAZA NOW! FEED GAZA NOW!
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mobile USENET readers Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.co.uk> - 2026-08-22 13:41 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-22 15:28 +0200
Re: Mobile USENET readers Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-22 17:11 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-08-22 18:20 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-22 09:26 -0800
Re: Mobile USENET readers Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 14:48 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-23 07:12 -0800
Re: Mobile USENET readers Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 18:51 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> - 2026-08-23 20:13 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Truth in Writing <OnlyTruthMatters@is.invalid> - 2026-08-23 21:14 +0000
Re: Mobile USENET readers David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-08-23 23:46 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-08-24 09:14 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Colin Macleod <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-08-24 09:43 +0000
Re: Mobile USENET readers Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-24 16:42 +0200
Re: Mobile USENET readers Colin Macleod <user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-08-24 08:59 +0000
Re: Mobile USENET readers Ivan Zelenyi <iz264279@gmail.com> - 2026-08-23 18:21 +0500
Re: Mobile USENET readers Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-22 21:30 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Lumin Etherlight <lumin+usenet@etherlight.link> - 2026-08-23 12:58 +0300
Re: Mobile USENET readers Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 19:12 +0100
Re: Mobile USENET readers Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.co.uk> - 2026-08-23 20:13 +0100
csiph-web