Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31424

Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread
Date 2016-09-22 06:46 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <1785722.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <bb5b8949-1a0f-4b91-a603-e3824a269277@googlegroups.com> <2533447.e9J7NaK4W3@PointedEars.de> <37d668a8-cf34-4c5f-9ca1-a463ac5e496d@googlegroups.com> <10043161.f3KcPn1T7V@PointedEars.de> <759d1fb3-42cb-4a68-b972-f489a42d025f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 2:26:47 PM UTC-5, Thomas 'PointedEars'
> Lahn wrote:
>> > The referenced link looks to me to be aligned with my reasoning.
>> 
>> You have not presented your reasoning so far.  Instead you have tried to
>> shift the burden of proof by asking (me) a question in return. 
>> Therefore, whether the “referenced link” (you mean the referenced/linked
>> _resource_ instead) is *actually* *objectively* aligned with your
>> reasoning or only seems to be so *to you* (“looks to me”) remains
>> unknown.
>> 
>> Proper reasoning would go along the lines, “these are the $FACTS of the
>> situation, and from $STATEMENT(S) in $RESOURCE (I think that) it follows,
>> given these $FACTS, that …”.  Only from that a constructive discussion
>> could ensue.
>> 
>> HTH
> 
> That is now five posts in a row of no useful reply from you on the topic
> at hand. If you wish to continue in such a manner, you can continue alone.
> Such noise adds nothing. By now you could have expanded on what you
> disagreed with specifically but have instead chosen to engage in shallow
> meta-discussion; again.

<https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque>

I have given you, again, an explanation as to why this discussion cannot be 
a constructive one (cannot lead anywhere) based on your arguments so far, 
and hints as to how you (and only you) can turn this discussion into a 
constructive one.  (That was useful advice even though it was not on the 
topic.)  I have offered to you to have such a discussion with you.  If you 
are not willing to have it, and insist on your previous fallacies and on 
committing new fallacies instead, then that is *your* problem.

<https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof>

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Parsing javascript file off the main thread georgkothmeier@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 06:29 -0700
  Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-09-16 17:43 +0200
    Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 16:16 -0700
    Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 16:18 -0700
      Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-09-17 10:47 +0200
  Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-18 10:55 -0700
    Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 00:28 -0700
      Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 08:15 -0700
        Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-19 19:46 +0200
          Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 11:00 -0700
            Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-19 20:42 +0200
              Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 11:53 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-20 00:01 +0200
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 12:02 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-20 21:26 +0200
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 17:38 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-22 06:46 +0200
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-22 05:53 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-23 02:42 +0200
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-23 09:29 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 12:00 -0700
                Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-21 02:24 +0000

csiph-web