Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31424
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread |
| Date | 2016-09-22 06:46 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1785722.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <bb5b8949-1a0f-4b91-a603-e3824a269277@googlegroups.com> <2533447.e9J7NaK4W3@PointedEars.de> <37d668a8-cf34-4c5f-9ca1-a463ac5e496d@googlegroups.com> <10043161.f3KcPn1T7V@PointedEars.de> <759d1fb3-42cb-4a68-b972-f489a42d025f@googlegroups.com> |
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 2:26:47 PM UTC-5, Thomas 'PointedEars' > Lahn wrote: >> > The referenced link looks to me to be aligned with my reasoning. >> >> You have not presented your reasoning so far. Instead you have tried to >> shift the burden of proof by asking (me) a question in return. >> Therefore, whether the “referenced link” (you mean the referenced/linked >> _resource_ instead) is *actually* *objectively* aligned with your >> reasoning or only seems to be so *to you* (“looks to me”) remains >> unknown. >> >> Proper reasoning would go along the lines, “these are the $FACTS of the >> situation, and from $STATEMENT(S) in $RESOURCE (I think that) it follows, >> given these $FACTS, that …”. Only from that a constructive discussion >> could ensue. >> >> HTH > > That is now five posts in a row of no useful reply from you on the topic > at hand. If you wish to continue in such a manner, you can continue alone. > Such noise adds nothing. By now you could have expanded on what you > disagreed with specifically but have instead chosen to engage in shallow > meta-discussion; again. <https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque> I have given you, again, an explanation as to why this discussion cannot be a constructive one (cannot lead anywhere) based on your arguments so far, and hints as to how you (and only you) can turn this discussion into a constructive one. (That was useful advice even though it was not on the topic.) I have offered to you to have such a discussion with you. If you are not willing to have it, and insist on your previous fallacies and on committing new fallacies instead, then that is *your* problem. <https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof> -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Parsing javascript file off the main thread georgkothmeier@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 06:29 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-09-16 17:43 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 16:16 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 16:18 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-09-17 10:47 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-18 10:55 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Georg Kothmeier <georgkothmeier@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 00:28 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 08:15 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-19 19:46 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 11:00 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-19 20:42 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-19 11:53 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-20 00:01 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 12:02 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-20 21:26 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 17:38 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-22 06:46 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-22 05:53 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-09-23 02:42 +0200
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-09-20 12:00 -0700
Re: Parsing javascript file off the main thread Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-21 02:24 +0000
csiph-web