Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.puzzles, sci.lang, alt.usage.english |
| Subject | Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... |
| References | <6a242d73.fdd1b77a8a797b8a@csiph.com> |
| Date | 2026-06-06 20:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1780778255-4353@newsgrouper.org> (permalink) |
| Organization | jamesdowallen@gmail.com |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> posted: > >>> Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great in > >>> detective writing alone that his successors to that > >>> realm must needs in self-defence make light of an obligation > >>> they cannot wholly deny. > > I thought this contained a typo or typoes !!! > > I had to have my teacher (AI) parse and explain it to me! Parsing complex sentences was once one of my hobbies; this sentence is a real dilly! First dispose of "needs." The suffix "-s" looks weird, but is NEITHER a plural marker nor a verb inflection. It is an ancient marker that converts a noun to an adverb; it also occurs in "always." (Sometimes the "-s" becomes "-ce" as in "once" or "thence.") I'm not sure how best to treat "make light of." Is it short for "make light work of"? The sentence in question has three clauses: (1) (influence | has been | great (in | writing)) (2) (successors (to | realm) | (must (make light (of | obligation)))) (3) (they | (cannot deny)) There are TWO "that"s connecting clauses (1) and (2): One connects the clauses' major predicates; the other connects "realm" back to "writing." An implicit "that" connects obligation to the 3rd clause. I think "to that realm" may be incorrect; I prefer "in that realm." Objections?
Back to rec.puzzles | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-06-06 14:23 +0000
Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-06 20:37 +0000
Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-06-06 23:02 -0400
Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 09:18 +0000
Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-06-07 05:37 -0400
Re: Sir A. Conan Doyle's influence has been so great ... Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-06-07 06:29 +0100
csiph-web