Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.puzzles |
| Subject | Re: Two distances among Four Points |
| References | <1773774860-4353@newsgrouper.org> <10pjuar$1n96j$1@dont-email.me> <1774026710-4353@newsgrouper.org> <10pmf28$2ilha$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2026-03-22 07:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1774164058-4353@newsgrouper.org> (permalink) |
Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> posted:
> On 20/03/2026 17:11, James Dow Allen wrote:
> >
> > Now: Solve the companion puzzle:
> > James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:
> >> A closely related puzzle is to arrange FIVE distinct points such that
> >> only two inter-point distances occur.
> >
> > ... and describe the weird/wonderful relationship between this 5-point
> > companion puzzle and the question I asked earlier:
> >> Which of the six {4-point, 2-distances} arrangements is hardest to think of?
> >
>
> I think this 5-point puzzle is likely to be easier for many people than finding the 6'th solution to
> the 4-point puzzle, and might lead them to the 6'th solution indirectly! (That's amusing when you
> think about it...)
>
> Anyway, nice puzzle!
>
> Mike.
Yes. The 5-point solution is easier to think of than the 4-point solution.
Are there other examples where an ostensibly harder puzzle is in practice
easier to solve than a less general, ostensibly easier-to-solve subset
of the puzzle?
Cheers,
꧁ ᩎ꧅᭾ ꧂
Back to rec.puzzles | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-17 19:14 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points Charlie Roberts <croberts@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 16:36 -0400
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-20 06:03 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points Charlie Roberts <croberts@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 12:50 -0400
Re: Two distances among Four Points Charlie Roberts <croberts@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 11:04 -0400
Re: Two distances among Four Points Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2026-03-20 16:22 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2026-05-19 20:01 +0300
Re: Two distances among Four Points "Carl G." <carlgnews@microprizes.com> - 2026-03-20 09:58 -0700
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-20 17:11 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2026-03-21 15:55 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-22 07:20 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points HenHanna@NewsGrouper <user4055@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-23 16:16 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2026-03-25 02:40 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-25 11:44 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points "Carl G." <carlgnews@microprizes.com> - 2026-03-25 09:17 -0700
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-26 07:58 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points "Carl G." <carlgnews@microprizes.com> - 2026-03-26 10:26 -0700
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-27 10:25 +0000
Re: Two distances among Four Points James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-27 20:27 +0000
csiph-web