Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #568456
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: GPS Off Course |
| Followup-To | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2016-04-07 04:40 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1708302.C6Vyty1ys6@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <ndrjhn$s8u$1@dont-email.me> <ndu8tc$8t8$1@news.albasani.net> <nduiut$a2h$1@dont-email.me> <ndvq7f$1k6$1@news.albasani.net> <ndvs4e$1k1$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity
hanson wrote: > ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - c^2dt^2 ..... [1]. > > Some say ds^2 is "space-time", others say that > ds is "space-time", other still insist that ds^2 or > ds are "space-time intervals", while others are > adamant that "s" happens to be "space-time" Who, according to your research, says either one, and where? > Just tell me the MLT dimensions of "space-time" There are no “MLT dimensions of space-time”. You are confused as to the proper use of the term “dimension”, and you do not understand yet what “space-time” is. You must realize that there are different definitions for the term “dimension” as there are different contexts in which it is used, if you are going to understand “space-time” in physics. <http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=dimension&dataset=> pp. Relevant here: On the one hand there are dimensions in mathematics, of geometric manifolds, which are degrees of freedom in the choice of coordinates in such a manifold. <http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=dimension&dataset=&rawformassumption=%7B%22C%22, +%22dimension%22%7D+-%3E+%7B%22MathWorld%22%7D> On the other hand there are dimensions in physics, of physical quantities which can be described in terms of combinations of the quantities mass (M), length (L), and time (T). <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis> It just happens that because mechanics is concerned with the motion of bodies, it is useful in physics to consider the mathematical concept of 3+1 space(-)time, as a body always occupies a particular position in space at a particular time. Whereas motion can be described as a change in three spatial coordinates and one temporal coordinate. <http://www.britannica.com/topic/Albert-Einstein-on-Space-Time-1987141> HTH F'up2 sci.physics.relativity PointedEars -- Q: Who's on the case when the electricity goes out? A: Sherlock Ohms. (from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-01 12:21 -0800
Re: GPS Off Course Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 14:30 -0500
Re: GPS Off Course jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-01 22:15 +0000
Re: GPS Off Course Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-01 20:37 -0500
Re: GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-01 19:26 -0800
Re: GPS Off Course Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-01 21:33 -0500
Re: GPS Off Course Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 13:38 +0000
Re: GPS Off Course Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 13:45 +0000
Re: GPS Off Course Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 12:07 +0000
Re: GPS Off Course Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 08:49 -0500
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-02 08:10 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-02 23:22 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-02 16:20 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-03 13:37 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-03 10:25 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-04 19:39 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-04 13:34 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-05 09:41 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 01:17 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-05 20:00 +0200
ORI Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 13:12 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 13:54 -0700
Re: ORI Re: GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 17:07 -0700
Re: ORI Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 17:26 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-07 04:40 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-06 22:56 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-07 22:54 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-07 17:02 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-08 05:36 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-08 01:26 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-08 22:16 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-08 22:18 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-04-09 08:17 +0200
Re: GPS Off Course "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-09 00:24 -0700
Re: GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-02 13:36 -0800
Re: GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-02 13:38 -0800
Re: GPS Off Course The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-02 21:46 -0800
csiph-web