Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #468307

Re: LIGO 2016

Show all headers | View raw

mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:

> On Saturday, 18 August 2018 16:04:19 UTC+2, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn 
> wrote:
>> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
>> > On Saturday, 18 August 2018 13:46:07 UTC+2, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> > wrote:
>> >> However, one can observe and HAS OBSERVED in 2017 the result of two
>> >> NEUTRON STARS MERGING, across the electromagnetic spectrum, including
>> >> visible light, and one can determine and HAS DETERMINED that the
>> >> gravitational waves caused by such an event come FROM THE SAME AREA OF
>> >> SPACE, IN THE WAY PREDICTED BY
>> >> THE THEORY (GENERAL RELATIVITY).  This confirms once again that
>> >> gravitational waves are a REAL phenomenon and that general relativity
>> >> provides is a CORRECT description of Nature.
>> > Unfortunately, it confirms only to fanatic believers.
>> For the intellectually challenged:
>> 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajZojAwfEbs>
> 
> [unrelated nonsense]

The Date header field of your posting shows that you have replied to my 
posting only 5 minutes later.

The video I referred to in it is 8 minutes 20 seconds long.

This tells me:

1. You have too much free time on your hands for your own good.

2. Since you are using Google Groups, you must be spending your free time
   with frantically updating the posting in sci.physics.relativity to find
   postings that you can, cluelessly, disagree with, for your self-
   aggrandizement.

3. You have not watched the video to the end, if at all, before replying.
   This is the /modus operandi/ of an ignorant.

4. Not only you do not know what you are talking about; you do not want to
   know.  This is the /modus operandi/ of a believer: a believer will
   disregard all evidence that is (potentially) contrary to their belief;
   in this case, your belief that our universe would be easy to understand
   (so that your puny mind would be able to understand it, which would give
   your sorry existence some meaning), and that the elaborate descriptions
   that science has come up with would be part of some sort of conspiracy
   based on belief, to keep you from learning the simple universal truth.

Well, (not really) sorry to break it to you, the simple truth is instead: 
the ways to describe our universe properly are not simple because our 
universe is not.  It is awfully complicated, which is why after about 400 
years we have only managed to figure out a small part of it – but that well.  
It is why it takes long and hard studying to understand how it probably 
works; why it takes a scientist, and not only only a laymen like yourself, 
to work on those problems.

The record shows that it can be expected that you reply to this with some 
sort of half-wit nonsense.  It would be agreeable if you disappointed that 
expectation for a change.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What did the nuclear physicist post on the laboratory door
   when he went camping?  
A: 'Gone fission'.
(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-17 10:21 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-17 19:22 +0000
    Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-18 13:46 +0200
      Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 05:19 -0700
        Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-18 16:04 +0200
          Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 07:09 -0700
            Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 02:54 +0200
              Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 22:20 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 14:01 +0000
                Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 07:53 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 19:46 +0200
                Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 11:48 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cs> - 2018-08-19 18:59 +0000
      Re: LIGO 2016 Sushika Imaki <kukih@wkkss.ki> - 2018-08-18 18:01 +0000
        Re: LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-18 12:42 -0700
        Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 04:34 +0200
          Re: LIGO 2016 Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 11:11 +0000
            Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 19:06 +0200
              Re: LIGO 2016 Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cs> - 2018-08-19 18:54 +0000
      Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 11:55 -0700
        Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 23:20 +0200
          Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 14:31 -0700
            Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 00:08 +0200
              Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:39 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 17:56 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 03:27 +0200
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 20:48 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 10:38 +0200
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 08:53 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 09:11 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 18:30 +0200
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 09:41 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:06 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:54 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:06 -0700
                Re: LIGO 2016 "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 09:32 -0700
              Re: LIGO 2016 mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 21:26 -0700
              Re: LIGO 2016 Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 12:06 +0000
                Re: LIGO 2016 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 16:08 +0200
  Re: LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-18 12:39 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-18 12:50 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 09:42 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 09:51 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 14:17 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 17:22 -0700
  Re: LIGO 2016 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:59 -0700

csiph-web