Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #11030
| From | laird@lbreyer.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points |
| Date | 2011-10-20 14:16 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <16331545.1098.1319145393057.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfp13> (permalink) |
| References | <26287949.549.1319095405219.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfp13> <j7p41q$lt3$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thursday, 20 October 2011 23:26:33 UTC+11, Victor Bazarov wrote: > > > > Shouldn't this actually be equivalent to > f(f(f(f(std::cout,i),i++),i),"\n") where f is operator<< ? In that case, > each time a function is entered, there should be a sequence point which > makes the side effects happen. So I'd expect the output to be 112 instead. > > Yes, but the sequence point has no effect on when the *second* argument > for every call is evaluated. You seem to forget that. Victor, this explains why I was confused. I was secretly thinking of the other case cout << "good " << "news " << "everybody\n"; where the compiler can also evaluate the strings in any order, but this works in that case because they are all constant, so every possible ordering gives the same return value. Thanks to everybody who responded.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Help with post-increment and sequence points laird@lbreyer.com - 2011-10-20 00:23 -0700
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-10-20 12:57 +0100
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points softwareEngineer <ovNOSPAM@NOSPAMlibero.it> - 2011-10-20 14:16 +0200
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-10-20 08:26 -0400
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-20 06:06 -0700
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-10-20 09:50 -0400
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points laird@lbreyer.com - 2011-10-20 14:16 -0700
Re: Help with post-increment and sequence points Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-10-20 18:09 +0200
csiph-web